Regulation and Trust: 3-Month Follow-up Study on COVID-19 Mortality in 25 European Countries
Open Access
- 24 April 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by JMIR Publications Inc. in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- Vol. 6 (2) , e19218
- https://doi.org/10.2196/19218
Abstract
Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet #Preprint #PeerReviewMe: Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint. Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn. Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period. Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author). Background: The outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has dramatically changed societies in 2020. Since the end of February, Europe has been hit particularly hard by COVID-19, but there are major country differences in both the spread of the virus and measures taken to stop the virus. Social psychological factors such as institutional trust could be important in understanding the development of the epidemic. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine country variations of COVID-19 mortality in Europe by analyzing social risk factors explaining the spread of the disease, restrictions and control measures, and institutional trust. Methods: The present study was based on a background analysis of European Social Survey data on 25 European countries (N=47,802). Multilevel mixed effects linear regression models focused on 84 days of the COVID-19 epidemic (January 22 to April 14, 2020) and modelled the daily COVID-19 mortality. Analysis focused on the impact of social relations, restrictions, and institutional trust within each country. Results: The spread of the COVID-19 epidemic has been fast everywhere, but the findings revealed significant differences between countries in COVID-19 mortality. Perceived sociability predicted higher COVID-19 mortality. Major differences between the 25 countries were found in reaction times to the crisis. Late reaction to the crisis predicted later mortality figures. Institutional trust was associated with lower COVID-19 mortality. Conclusions: The analyses demonstrated the importance of societal and social psychological factors in the spread of the COVID-19 epidemic. By considering multiple perspectives, this study showed that country differences in Europe are major, and this will have an impact on how countries will cope with the ongoing crisis in the following months. The results indicated the importance of timely restrictions and cooperation with people.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trusting the State, Trusting Each Other? The Effect of Institutional Trust on Social TrustPolitical Behavior, 2015
- Measuring Trust in European Public InstitutionsSocial Indicators Research, 2014
- The Effect of Terror on Institutional Trust: New Evidence from the 3/11 Madrid Terrorist AttackPolitical Psychology, 2013
- Public perceptions, anxiety, and behaviour change in relation to the swine flu outbreak: cross sectional telephone surveyBMJ, 2009
- Community Resilience as a Metaphor, Theory, Set of Capacities, and Strategy for Disaster ReadinessAmerican Journal of Community Psychology, 2007
- Institutional Trust and Subjective Well‐Being across the EUKyklos, 2006
- Trust relations in health care—the new agendaEuropean Journal of Public Health, 2006
- Psychosocial Factors Influencing the Practice of Preventive Behaviors Against the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Among Older Chinese in Hong KongJournal of Aging and Health, 2005
- Trust, Social Capital, Civil Society, and DemocracyInternational Political Science Review, 2001
- Interpersonal Distance, Body Orientation, and Touch: Effects of Culture, Gender, and AgeThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1995