Gerald Koenig

Background: Unstable angina has become an exceedingly rare diagnosis in the era of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn). Objectives: We sought to identify the incidence of unstable angina and characterize patients with low hs-cTn in emergency departments (EDs). Methods: A prespecified secondary analysis of the Rapid Acute Coronary Syndrome Exclusion using high-sensitivity cardiac Troponin I (RACE-IT) trial was conducted. RACE-IT was a stepped-wedge randomized trial comparing two rule-out protocols (0/1- and 0/3 h) for myocardial infarction (MI) in nine EDs from July 2020 to April 2021. All patients had hs-cTnI (Beckman Coulter) concentrations below or equal to the 99th percentile upper reference limit of 18 ng/L. The primary outcome was unstable angina, based on the ISCHEMIA trial definition, which required electrocardiographic changes or findings at coronary angiography (angiographic evidence of plaque rupture or thrombus). Results: Of the 32,608 patients in the trial, 60 patients (0.2%) met the definition of unstable angina, of whom 46 (77%) had obstructive disease at coronary angiography and 17 (28%) had an ischemic electrocardiogram. Coronary revascularization was performed in 45 (75%) patients and seven (12%) had left main or 3-vessel coronary artery disease. There were seven (12%) patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease, and seven (12%) who had angiographically unremarkable coronary arteries. Patients with unstable angina were older (p = 0.015), more likely to be male (p = 0.005), with a higher prevalence of hypertension (p < 0.001), known coronary artery disease (p < 0.001), peripheral vascular disease (p = 0.035), and a higher serum creatinine (p = 0.018). At 30 days, two patients had a type 1 MI and there were no deaths. Conclusions: Unstable angina was diagnosed in 1 in 500 patients with a low hs-cTnI value at presentation to the ED and these patients had an excellent prognosis at 30 days. These patients tend not to have high-risk anatomy and one in four had non-obstructive coronary artery disease or angiographically unremarkable coronary arteries.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common acute cardiovascular condition. Within this review, we discuss the incidence, pathophysiology, and treatment options for patients with high-risk and massive pulmonary embolisms. In particular, we focus on the role of mechanical circulatory support devices and their possible therapeutic benefits in patients who are unresponsive to standard therapeutic options. Moreover, attention is given to device selection criteria, weaning protocols, and complication mitigation strategies. Finally, we underscore the necessity for more comprehensive studies to corroborate the benefits and safety of MCS devices in PE management.