Juan Liu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Juan Liu has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Jingyan Lan
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, Guangxi 541004, China
2 shared publications - Diwakar Kc
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606, USA
1 shared publication - Liang Bo Hu
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606, USA
1 shared publication - Ting Wang
College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China
1 shared publication - Xi-Jun Song
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, China
1 shared publication - Xijun Song
College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 8 April 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Natural Hazards
- Vol. 117 (3) , 2455-2471
A comparative study of seismic responses of land and sea sites based on centrifuge model testing
- 8 April 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Natural Hazards
- Vol. 117 (3) , 2455-2471
A comparative study of seismic responses of land and sea sites based on centrifuge model testing
- Open Access
- 10 January 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
- Vol. 11 (1) , 167
A Comparative Centrifuge Test Study on the Influence of Overlying Seawater on Seismic Response Spectrum
In this study, dynamic centrifugal model tests for two homogeneous saturated soft clay sites are designed to analyze the influence of overlying sea water on ground motion. We obtain the response spectrum value and amplification coefficient from the acceleration sensor records. Through comparative analysis, we conclude that with the increase in input peak ground motion, the acceleration response spectrum value at the same depth gradually increases. When the input peak value is small, there is no significant difference between the response spectra with and without water; when the input peak value is large, there is no significant difference in the high-frequency part of the response spectrum value. In the middle- and low-frequency part, the response spectrum value with water is obviously smaller than that without water. The amplitude of the response spectrum of the water-free model gradually moves in the long-period direction, but the water model tends to the short-period direction. In the long-period part, the amplification coefficient of the water model is obviously smaller than that of the water free model.
- 10 January 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
- Vol. 11 (1) , 167
Open AccessA Comparative Centrifuge Test Study on the Influence of Overlying Seawater on Seismic Response Spectrum
In this study, dynamic centrifugal model tests for two homogeneous saturated soft clay sites are designed to analyze the influence of overlying sea water on ground motion. We obtain the response spectrum value and amplification coefficient from the acceleration sensor records. Through comparative analysis, we conclude that with the increase in input peak ground motion, the acceleration response spectrum value at the same depth gradually increases. When the input peak value is small, there is no significant difference between the response spectra with and without water; when the input peak value is large, there is no significant difference in the high-frequency part of the response spectrum value. In the middle- and low-frequency part, the response spectrum value with water is obviously smaller than that without water. The amplitude of the response spectrum of the water-free model gradually moves in the long-period direction, but the water model tends to the short-period direction. In the long-period part, the amplification coefficient of the water model is obviously smaller than that of the water free model.