ESEmilia Staniewska

Emilia Staniewska

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Emilia Staniewska has a total of 23 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Andrea D’AMico

    Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland

    1 shared publication
  • Damian Borys

    Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland

    1 shared publication
  • Ewa Burchardt

    Greater Poland Cancer Center in Poznan, Poland

    1 shared publication
  • Izabela Gorczewska

    Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland

    1 shared publication
  • Justyna Rembak-Szynkiewicz

    Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland

    1 shared publication
  • Justyna Rembak-Szynkiewicz

    Department of Radiodiagnostics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, 44-101 Gliwice, Poland

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    The prognostic value of baseline 18FDG – Positron Emission Tomography – Computed Tomography in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy – External multicentre validation model

    by Emilia Staniewska, Magdalena Stankiewicz, Ewa Burchardt, Karolina Grudzien, Katarzyna Raczek-Zwierzycka, Justyna Rembak-Szynkiewicz, Matylda Sobczak, Andrea D’AMico, Damian Borys, Izabela Gorczewska, et al.

  • Open Access

    The Prognostic Value of the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) and Red Cell Distribution Width (RDW) in Patients with Cervical Cancer Treated Using Radiotherapy

    by Emilia Staniewska, Karolina Grudzien, Magdalena Stankiewicz, Katarzyna Raczek-Zwierzycka, Justyna Rembak-Szynkiewicz, Zuzanna Nowicka, Rafal Tarnawski, Marcin Miszczyk

    Introduction: There is growing interest in the prognostic value of routinely performed pre-treatment blood test indices, such as the RDW or SII, with the latter combining the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). These indices were shown to be prognostic for survival in some malignancies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between pre-treatment RDW and SII, and OS in patients treated with radiotherapy for primary localised cervical cancer. Material and Methods: This retrospective analysis included patients treated with definitive CRT between 2011 and 2017 for histopathologically confirmed FIGO 2018 stage IB2-IVA cervical cancer. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method, two-sided log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models, with the AIC serving as a prediction error estimator. Results: The study group included 249 patients with a median age of 57.2 years and a median follow-up of 75.8 months. The majority were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma (237; 95.2%) and had FIGO stage III (211; 84.7%). Approximately half of the patients (116; 46.4%) had regional lymph node metastases. Patients with a low RDW (≤13.4%) and low SII (≤986.01) had a significantly longer OS (p = 0.001 and p = 0.002). The RDW remained as an independent prognostic factor in the multivariable model (high vs. low; HR = 2.04; 95% CI: 1.32–3.16; p = 0.001). Including RDW in the model decreased the Akaike Information Criterion from 1028.25 to 1018.15. Conclusions: The RDW is a cheap and widely available index that is simultaneously an independent prognostic factor for survival and could be used to improve pre-treatment prognosis assessments in patients with cervical cancer undergoing CRT. Available data encourage assessing the RDW as a prognostic factor in prospective trials to aid the identification of candidates for treatment escalation.