Quantitative differences in retest effects across different methods used to construct alternate test forms
Authors:
- Martin E. ArendasyMAMartin E. Arendasy
- Markus SommerMSMarkus Sommer
- 1 May 2013
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Intelligence
- Vol. 41 (3) , 181-192
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using automatic item generation to meet the increasing item demands of high-stakes educational and occupational assessmentLearning and Individual Differences, 2012
- Using Automatic Item Generation to Simultaneously Construct German and English Versions of a Word Fluency TestJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2011
- Evaluating the contribution of different item features to the effect size of the gender difference in three-dimensional mental rotation using automatic item generationIntelligence, 2010
- Do Examinees Have Similar Test-Taking Effort? A High-Stakes Question for Low-Stakes TestingInternational Journal of Testing, 2010
- Using psychometric technology in educational assessment: The case of a schema-based isomorphic approach to the automatic generation of quantitative reasoning itemsLearning and Individual Differences, 2007
- Automatic Generation of Quantitative Reasoning ItemsJournal of Individual Differences, 2006
- The effect of practice on Raven's Advanced Progressive MatricesLearning and Individual Differences, 2003
- Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement InvarianceStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2002
- Coaching, test sophistication, and developed abilities.American Psychologist, 1981
- A Goodness of Fit Test for the Rasch ModelPsychometrika, 1973