Long-term clinical outcome of minimally invasive versus open single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis
- 1 December 2021
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in The Spine Journal
- Vol. 21 (12) , 2049-2065
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Mayo Clinic
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusionEuropean Spine Journal, 2012
- Extent of intraoperative muscle dissection does not affect long-term outcomes after minimally invasive surgery versus open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery: A prospective longitudinal cohort studySurgical Neurology International, 2012
- Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative SpineTechniques in Orthopaedics, 2011
- An international registry of systematic-review protocolsThe Lancet, 2011
- Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody FusionSpine, 2010
- Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar DiseasesSpine, 2010
- Lumbar degenerative spinal deformity: Surgical options of PLIF, TLIF and MI-TLIFIndian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2010
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA StatementJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2009
- Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsBMJ, 2004
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003