Risk of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Computed Tomography
Authors:
- Byungjin ChoiBCByungjin Choi
- Subin HeoSHSubin Heo
- Jennifer S. McdonaldJMJennifer S. Mcdonald
- Sang Hyun ChoiSCSang Hyun Choi
- Won-Mook ChoiWCWon-Mook Choi
- Jung Bok LeeJLJung Bok Lee
- Eunyoung Angela LeeELEunyoung Angela Lee
- Seong Ho ParkSPSeong Ho Park
- Soobeen SeolSSSoobeen Seol
- Sujin GanSGSujin Gan
- Bumhee ParkBPBumhee Park
- Hee Jung ChoiHCHee Jung Choi
Open Access
- 28 November 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Investigative Radiology
- Vol. 60 (6) , 376-386
Abstract
Objectives: Concern about contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) may delay the timely administration of contrast media for computed tomography (CT). The precise causative effect of iodinated contrast media on CI-AKI and its relevant risk factors remains an area of ongoing investigation. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the risk of CI-AKI following contrast-enhanced CT and its predisposing risk factors. Materials and Methods: This study employed a 1:1 propensity score matching analysis using electronic medical records gathered between January 2006 and December 2022 from 16 institutions in South Korea. Contrast-enhanced and nonenhanced CT scans in patients aged 18 years and above were matched for baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), demographic characteristics, and clinical variables to assess the risk of CI-AKI. Subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate any significant risk factors for CI-AKI. Results: A total of 182,170 CT scans with contrast were matched to 182,170 CT scans without contrast. The risk of CI-AKI in the entire study cohort was not statistically significant (odds ratio [OR], 1.036; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.968–1.109; P = 0.34). Subgroup analyses revealed a significantly higher risk of CI-AKI in patients with eGFR 2 (OR, 1.176; 95% CI, 1.080–1.281; P = 0.011) or eGFR 30–45 mL/min/1.73m2 (OR, 1.139; 95% CI, 1.043–1.244; P = 0.019), patients diagnosed with chronic kidney disease (OR, 1.215; 95% CI, 1.084–1.361; P = 0.011), and those administered with iso-osmolar contrast media (OR, 1.392; 95% CI, 1.196–1.622; P = 0.011). Conclusions: The risk of CI-AKI following CT was minimal in the general population. However, caution is warranted for patients with chronic kidney disease and eGFR lower than 45 mL/min/1.73m2, or those administered with iso-osmolar contrast media.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efficacy and safety of N-acetylcysteine for preventing post-intravenous contrast acute kidney injury in patients with kidney impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysisEuropean Radiology, 2023
- Risk of acute kidney injury after contrast-enhanced computerized tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 propensity score–matched cohort studiesEuropean Radiology, 2022
- Changing serum creatinine in the detection of acute renal failure and recovery following radiocontrast studies among acutely ill inpatients: Reviewing insights regarding renal functional reserve gained by large-data analysisPractical Laboratory Medicine, 2022
- Effect of No Prehydration vs Sodium Bicarbonate Prehydration Prior to Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography in the Prevention of Postcontrast Acute Kidney Injury in Adults With Chronic Kidney DiseaseJAMA Internal Medicine, 2020
- Nephrotoxicity of iodinated contrast media: From pathophysiology to prevention strategiesEuropean Journal of Radiology, 2019
- Preventing contrast medium-induced acute kidney injuryEuropean Radiology, 2018
- Prophylactic hydration to protect renal function from intravascular iodinated contrast material in patients at high risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (AMACING): a prospective, randomised, phase 3, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trialThe Lancet, 2017
- Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity‐score matched samplesStatistics in Medicine, 2009
- Pathophysiology of Contrast-Induced NephropathyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2006
- Adjusting for multiple testing—when and how?Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2001