Hand Grip Force–Time Curve Indicators Evaluated by Dynamometer: A Systematic Review
Open Access
Abstract
Background: Handgrip strength (HGS) is an indicator of muscular strength, used in the diagnosis of sarcopenia, undernutrition, and physical frailty as well as recovery. Typically, the maximum HGS value is used; however, recent evidence suggests the exploration of new indicators provided based on the force–time curve to achieve a more comprehensive assessment of muscle function. Therefore, the objective was to identify indicators of the HGS profile beyond maximum HGS, based on force–time curves, and to systematize knowledge about their applications to various types of samples, health issues, and physical performance. Methods: A systematic review was performed including studies whose participants’ HGS was assessed with a digital or adapted dynamometer. The outcome measures were HGS profile indicators calculated from the force–time curve. Results: a total of 15 studies were included, and the following indicators were identified: grip fatigue, fatigability index, fatigue rate, fatigue resistance, time to 80% maximal voluntary contraction, plateau coefficient of variability, time to maximum value, T-90%, release rate, power factor, grip work, average integrated area, endurance, cycle duration, time between cycles, maximum and minimum force–velocity, rate of grip force, final force, inflection point, integrated area, submaximal control, and response time. Conclusions: Various indicators based on the force–time curve can be assessed through digital or adapted dynamometers. Future research should analyze these indicators to understand their implications for muscle function assessment, to standardize evaluation procedures, to identify clinically relevant measures, and to clarify their implications in clinical practice.Keywords
Funding Information
- FCT/MCTES (LAETA UIDB/50022/2020)
This publication has 66 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing Additional Characteristics of Muscle Function With Digital Handgrip Dynamometry and Accelerometry: Framework for a Novel Handgrip Strength ProtocolJournal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2021
- Maximal Handgrip Strength Alone Could Be an Incomplete Measure of Muscle FunctionJournal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2021
- Grip Work Measurement with the Jamar Dynamometer: Validation of a Simple Equation for Clinical UseThe Journal of nutrition, health and aging, 2019
- Understanding the Feasibility and Validity of Muscle Strength Measurements in Aging AdultsJournal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2019
- Reference ranges of handgrip strength from 125,462 healthy adults in 21 countries: a prospective urban rural epidemiologic (PURE) studyJournal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, 2016
- Rate of force development: physiological and methodological considerationsEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology, 2016
- A comparison of electronic and manual dynamometry and goniometry in patients with fracture of the distal radius and healthy participantsJournal of Hand Therapy, 2016
- The SF-36: A simple, effective measure of mobility-disability for epidemiological studiesThe Journal of nutrition, health and aging, 2009
- Muscle strength testing: evaluation of tests of explosive force productionEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology, 2004
- Grip strength in different positions of elbow and shoulderArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1994