Mechanistic Insights into the Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Diagnosis and Management of Multiple Sclerosis
Open Access
- 27 May 2026
- journal article
- review article
- Published by MDPI AG in Pathophysiology
- Vol. 33 (2) , 35
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, immune-mediated demyelinating disease of the central nervous system whose heterogeneous clinical, radiological, and biological course has long resisted precise individual-level prediction. The recent convergence of large longitudinal datasets, advanced computational methods, and increasingly informative biomarkers has created conditions in which artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can begin to address that problem substantively. This review surveys the current evidence for AI/ML applications across the MS care continuum, with particular focus on the literature from 2022 through early 2026. Nine domains are examined: automated MRI lesion segmentation and quantification, fluid biomarker interpretation, unsupervised disease subtyping, disability progression prediction, treatment response stratification, drug repurposing and molecular discovery, digital biomarker monitoring, mechanistic interpretability, and integrated clinical management protocols. Notable recent contributions include the SuStaIn-based identification of two biologically distinct MS trajectories distinguished by early versus late serum neurofilament light chain elevation, the MindGlide deep learning platform enabling longitudinal analysis of archived routine clinical MRI data, the T-cell morphological classifier predicting natalizumab treatment response before drug initiation, and the fenebrutinib Phase III program that produced the first Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor results meeting primary endpoints in both relapsing and primary progressive MS. A proposed AI-Enhanced Management Protocol (AMP-26) reflecting 2026 clinical standards is included as an appendix. Throughout, emphasis is placed on mechanistic interpretability: the distinction between models that correlate features with outcomes and models whose decision logic reflects established MS pathobiology is considered a prerequisite for clinical credibility and regulatory readiness.Keywords
This publication has 65 references indexed in Scilit:
- How to build the virtual cell with artificial intelligence: Priorities and opportunitiesCell, 2024
- Predicting multiple sclerosis disease progression and outcomes with machine learning and MRI-based biomarkers: a reviewJournal of Neurology, 2024
- Evaluation of VQC-LSTM for disability forecasting in multiple sclerosis using sequential multisequence MRIQuantum Machine Intelligence, 2024
- Artificial Intelligence and Multiple SclerosisCurrent Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 2024
- Improving multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation across clinical sites: A federated learning approach with noise-resilient trainingArtificial Intelligence in Medicine, 2024
- Harmonizing Definitions for Progression Independent of Relapse Activity in Multiple SclerosisJAMA Neurology, 2023
- Serum Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Compared With Neurofilament Light Chain as a Biomarker for Disease Progression in Multiple SclerosisJAMA Neurology, 2023
- Stratification of multiple sclerosis patients using unsupervised machine learning: a single-visit MRI-driven approachEuropean Radiology, 2022
- Foundations of Machine Learning-Based Clinical Prediction Modeling: Part I—Introduction and General Principles2021
- Contribution of Relapse-Independent Progression vs Relapse-Associated Worsening to Overall Confirmed Disability Accumulation in Typical Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis in a Pooled Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical TrialsJAMA Neurology, 2020