Selective Trials: A Principal-Agent Approach to Randomized Controlled Experiments
Authors:
- 1 June 2012
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in American Economic Review
- Vol. 102 (4) , 1279-1309
Abstract
We study the design of randomized controlled experiments when outcomes are significantly affected by experimental subjects' unobserved effort expenditure. While standard randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are internally consistent, the unobservability of effort compromises external validity. We approach trial design as a principal-agent problem and show that natural extensions of RCTs—which we call selective trials—can help improve external validity. In particular, selective trials can disentangle the effects of treatment, effort, and the interaction of treatment and effort. Moreover, they can help identify when treatment effects are affected by erroneous beliefs and inappropriate effort expenditure.(JEL C90, D82)Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Financial Incentive–Based Approaches for Weight LossJAMA, 2008
- The Demand for, and Impact of, Learning HIV StatusAmerican Economic Review, 2008
- How High Are Rates of Return to Fertilizer? Evidence from Field Experiments in KenyaAmerican Economic Review, 2008
- The Illusion of SustainabilityThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2007
- Learning, Private Information, and the Economic Evaluation of Randomized ExperimentsJournal of Political Economy, 2006
- Patients' preferences and randomised trialsThe Lancet, 1996
- The Becker-DeGroot-Marschak mechanism and generalized utility theories: Theoretical predictions and empirical observationsTheory and Decision, 1993
- A Simple Model of Herd BehaviorThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1992
- The Empirical Content of the Roy ModelEconometrica, 1990
- A New Design for Randomized Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979