Problematic transitions from school to employment: freeters and NEETs in Japan and Germany
Authors:
- 14 October 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education
- Vol. 45 (1) , 70-93
Abstract
In the international debate surrounding transitions from school to employment, Japan and Germany are regularly cited as examples of success. This article draws on the Japanese concepts represented by two problematic groups – freeters and NEETs – to demonstrate that over recent years, young people in both countries have also been facing serious problems with the transition process. Interpretation of empirical data also, however, reveals a number of contrasts between them. We focus here on differences in their educational systems and on the role each system plays within its own society. The article also uses divergent recruitment practices and employment structures as vehicles for comparison and interpretation.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- The transition from education to employment in the context of stratification in Japan – a view from the outsideComparative Education, 2011
- The concept of transition systemJournal of Education and Work, 2008
- The German philosophy of vocational education2007
- Japanese “Furītā” and German “Generation Internship”: The “precarious post-materialist” as an extension to Inglehart‘s theory of value changeAsia Europe Journal, 2007
- Jobless Youths and the NEET Problem in JapanSocial Science Japan Journal, 2007
- The Creation of the Social Category of NEET (Not in Education, Employment or Training): Do NEET Need This?Social Science Japan Journal, 2007
- Evaluating Vocationalism*European Journal of Education, 2003
- The School-to-Work Transition: A Cross-National PerspectiveJournal of Economic Literature, 2001
- Introduction: Transitions to Employment in a Cross-National Perspective1999
- Comparative Youth Transition Research: Methods, Meanings, and Research RelationsEuropean Sociological Review, 1998