Developing an Analytic Tool Using a Participatory Research Approach to Examine Gender Differences in the Living Kidney Donation Process
Open Access
- 4 November 2025
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease
- Vol. 12
Abstract
Background: Sex-disaggregated data demonstrate that there are more female than male living kidney donors (LKDs), and this is widely thought to be a manifestation of gender inequities. A better understanding of how gender norms, roles, and relations influence the living kidney donation process is needed. Objective: We aimed to develop an analytical tool that can be used to conduct a systematic gender analysis of the living kidney donation process. Design: A participatory research approach was used. Setting: Canada. Participants: Canadian living kidney donors and health care professionals. Methods: Using a participatory research approach, we co-designed a gender analysis matrix (GAM) applicable to the context of living kidney donation. This tool is the first step into conducting a gender analysis of the living kidney donation process. Participants included 11 healthcare professionals, 6 LKDs, 1 patient partner, and a core methodology team (3 qualitative researchers and a gender analysis expert). Results: Following an iterative process, a final LKD-GAM with 4 columns and 4 rows was created. The gender-specific domains are access to resources, division of labor and everyday practices, social norms and beliefs, and decision-making power and autonomy. Context-specific domains are the decision to donate, physical and mental wellbeing, experiences with health services, and broader social and economic impacts of (non-)donation. Key insights for our future work include diversity in our sample (include LKD candidates, men, and different life stages) and unpacking the notions of consent, constrained consent, and subtle coercion. Limitations: The GAM’s scope is likely limited to the Canadian context. The study was also limited by the recruitment of LKDs from a past list of participants and by the lack of cultural and linguistic diversity in the sample. Conclusion: Using a participatory co-design approach, we have developed a robust tool that will inform a multinational qualitative study to better understand factors contributing to gender disparities in living kidney donation.Keywords
Funding Information
- CIHR ((PCS – 195106))
- CIHR (This work was supported by a Planning grant)
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Motivations and Experiences of Living Kidney Donors: A Thematic SynthesisAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2012
- Uncovering the Benefits of Participatory Research: Implications of a Realist Review for Health Research and PracticeThe Milbank Quarterly, 2012
- Is Living Kidney Donation the Answer to the Economic Problem of End-Stage Renal Disease?Seminars in Nephrology, 2009
- Faculty Perspectives on Community-Based Research: “I See This Still as a Journey”Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2009
- Combining individual interviews and focus groups to enhance data richnessJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2008
- The Value and Challenges of Participatory Research: Strengthening Its PracticeAnnual Review of Public Health, 2008
- Three Approaches to Qualitative Content AnalysisQualitative Health Research, 2005
- Gender imbalance among donors in living kidney transplantation: the Norwegian experienceNephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2005
- Motives for becoming a living kidney donorNephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2004
- Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthinessNurse Education Today, 2004