Utility of Repeat Head Computed Tomography After Blunt Head Trauma: A Systematic Review
Authors:
- Marjorie C. WangMWMarjorie C. Wang
- Ken F. LinnauKLKen F. Linnau
- David L. TirschwellDTDavid L. Tirschwell
- William HollingworthWHWilliam Hollingworth
- 1 July 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health
- Vol. 61 (1) , 226-233
Abstract
Repeat head computed tomography (CT) is standard practice for head-injured patients at many trauma centers. Utilization of CT has increased over time, yet effects on outcome and associated risks are unknown. We systematically reviewed the literature to determine the incidence of progression of injury on repeat CT and resulting treatment changes. Studies were included from Medline, Embase, and a hand search of citations in reviewed articles. Main outcome measures were progression of injury on repeat CT and resulting intervention. Data were abstracted from 30 eligible studies and discrepancies were settled by consensus. Progression of injury on repeat CT was evident in 8 to 67% of patients in the included studies. Neurosurgical intervention resulting subsequent to a repeat CT occurred in 0 to 54% of patients. More severe traumatic brain injury, defined by Glasgow Coma Scale, was associated with a higher proportion of patients with progression of injury on CT and subsequent neurosurgical interventions. Risk factors associated with progression of injury on CT or resulting intervention were inconsistently reported, but coagulopathy and injury severity were most commonly reported. Few studies reported changes in nonsurgical management, in-hospital disposition, or adverse events associated with obtaining repeat CTs. Indications for repeat head CT after traumatic brain injury are unclear. The wide range of reported injury progression on CT and resulting surgical and medical treatment changes suggest there may be a subset of patients who benefit from repeat CT. Further research should stratify by severity of traumatic brain injury, clearly define inclusion and exclusion criteria, address selection bias, quantify progression of injury on CT, determine factors predictive of injury progression and intervention, and assess risks associated with repeat CT.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sourcesBMJ, 2005
- Does Routine Serial Computed Tomography of the Head Influence Management of Traumatic Brain Injury? A Prospective Evaluation2004
- Effect of low doses of ionising radiation in infancy on cognitive function in adulthood: Swedish population based cohort studyBMJ, 2004
- CANCER RISKS FROM MEDICAL RADIATIONHealth Physics, 2003
- Utility of Routine Serial Computed Tomography for Blunt Intracranial Injury2001
- Lens injuries induced by occupational exposure in non-optimized interventional radiology laboratories.British Journal of Radiology, 1998
- Delayed onset of traumatic extradural hematomaJournal of Neurosurgery, 1985
- Irradiation dose to the lens of the eye during CT of the headNeuroradiology, 1982
- Neurological course and correlated computerized tomography findings after severe closed head injuryJournal of Neurosurgery, 1980
- Serial Computerized Tomographic Scanning and the Prognosis of Severe Head InjuryNeurosurgery, 1979