Intracytoplasmic sperm injection vs. conventional in vitro fertilization in patients with non-male factor infertility
Authors:
- 11 July 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Fertility and Sterility
- Vol. 118 (3) , 465-472
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- The University of Iowa Roy J and Lucille A Carver College of Medicine
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does intracytoplasmic sperm injection improve the fertilization rate and decrease the total fertilization failure rate in couples with well-defined unexplained infertility? A systematic review and meta-analysisFertility and Sterility, 2013
- Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for non-male factor infertility: a committee opinionFertility and Sterility, 2012
- Prognosis for clinical pregnancy and delivery after total fertilization failure during conventional in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injectionFertility and Sterility, 2008
- Trends in the Use of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a review of risks and complicationsBJU International, 2005
- Intracytoplasmic sperm injection as a treatment for unexplained total fertilization failure or low fertilization after conventional in vitro fertilizationFertility and Sterility, 2005
- Failed fertilization: is it predictable?Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2003
- The effect of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and semen parameters on blastocyst development in vitroHuman Reproduction, 2001
- Embryonic development in vitro is compromised by the ICSI procedureHuman Reproduction, 2000
- Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyteThe Lancet, 1992