Seismic performance of repaired lightly-reinforced concrete walls
Authors:
- Christopher J. MotterCMChristopher J. Motter
- Aaron B. ClausonACAaron B. Clauson
- James C. PetchJPJames C. Petch
- Matias A. HubeMHMatias A. Hube
- Richard S. HenryRHRichard S. Henry
- Kenneth J. ElwoodKEKenneth J. Elwood
Open Access
- 31 December 2017
- journal article
- Published by New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering in Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering
- Vol. 50 (4)
Abstract
As a result of the 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquakes, over 60% of the concrete buildings in the Christchurch Central Business District have been demolished. This experience has highlighted the need to provide guidance on the residual capacity and repairability of earthquake-damaged concrete buildings. As limited testing has been performed on repaired components, this study focuses on the performance of severely-damaged lightly-reinforced concrete walls repaired through replacement of reinforcement and concrete in the damaged region. The damage prior to repair included buckling and fracture of longitudinal reinforcement, crushing and spalling of concrete, and, for one of the two specimens, out-of-plane instability of the gross section. Prior to repairing the wall specimens, tensile testing of reinforcement with welded connections was conducted to verify acceptable performance of welds suitable for reinstating the damaged reinforcement. Repairs to the specimens consisted of removal of damaged concrete through either hydro-demolition or jack hammering, followed by cutting and removal of damaged reinforcement and reinstatement of new reinforcement and repair mortar. The two repaired wall specimens were tested using a standard protocol that was identical to that used for one of the two original wall specimens. Aside from a difference in the elastic stiffness, the load-deformation responses of the repaired specimens were similar to that of the originally-tested specimen through to the first loading cycle at 2.0% drift, beyond which strength degradation was more pronounced for the repaired specimens. The overall performance of the repaired walls relative to the original wall indicates that it is feasible to achieve acceptable performance of severely-damaged concrete walls repaired through replacement of reinforcement and concrete in the damaged region.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Understanding post-earthquake decisions on multi-storey concrete buildings in Christchurch, New ZealandBulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2015
- Understanding Poor Seismic Performance of Concrete Walls and Design ImplicationsEarthquake Spectra, 2014
- Performance of concrete buildings in the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake and implications for Canadian codesCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2013
- Analysis and interpretation of the seismic response of RC buildings in Concepción during the February 27, 2010, Chile earthquakeBulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2012
- Damage and Implications for Seismic Design of RC Structural Wall BuildingsEarthquake Spectra, 2012
- Repair of an 18‐Story Shear Wall Building Damaged in the 2010 Chile EarthquakeEarthquake Spectra, 2012
- Seismic performance of reinforced concrete buildings in the 22 February Christchurch (Lyttelton) earthquakeBulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 2011
- 5. Repair and Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Buildings for Seismic ResistanceEarthquake Spectra, 1991