Should edentulous patients be constrained to removable complete dentures? The use of dental implants to improve the quality of life for edentulous patients
- 17 February 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Gerodontology
- Vol. 27 (1) , 3-10
Abstract
doi:10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2009.00294.x Should edentulous patients be constrained to removable complete dentures? The use of dental implants to improve the quality of life for edentulous patients Background: Nowadays, there is some speculation among dental educators that the need for complete dentures will significantly decrease in the future and that training in their provision should be removed from the dental curriculum.Objective: To sensitise the reader to the functional shortcomings of complete denture therapy in the edentulous patient and present restorative options including implants to improve edentulous quality of life in these patients.Methods: Information retrieval followed a systematic approach using PubMed. English articles published from 1964 to 2008, in which the masticatory performance of patients with implant‐supported dentures was assessed by objective methods and compared with performance with conventional dentures, were included.Results: National epidemiological survey data suggested that the adult population in need of one or two complete dentures will increase from 35.4 million adults in 2000 to 37.9 million adults in 2020. Clinical studies have showed that the ratings of general satisfaction were significantly better in the patients treated with implant overdentures post‐delivery compared with the complete denture users. In addition, the implant group gave significantly higher ratings on comfort, stability and ability to chew. Furthermore, patients who received mandibular implant overdentures had significantly fewer oral health‐related quality of life problems than did the conventional group.Conclusion: Implant‐supported dentures including either complete overdentures or a hybrid prosthesis significantly improve the quality of life for edentulous patients compared with conventional removable complete dentures. Therefore, the contemporary dental practitioner should consider other options as well as conventional removable complete dentures to restore edentulous patients.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rehabilitation of Edentulous Mandibles by Means of Five TiUnite™ Implants After One‐Stage Surgery: A 1‐Year Retrospective Study of 90 PatientsClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2008
- Temporary Implant‐Supported Prosthesis for Immediate Loading According to a Chair‐Side Concept: Technical Note and Results from 37 Consecutive CasesClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2007
- A preliminary report of patients treated with early loaded implants using computerized tomography‐guided surgical stents: flapless versus conventional flapped surgeryJournal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2007
- A 2‐Year Clinical Report of Patients Treated With Two Loading Protocols for Mandibular Overdentures: Early Versus Conventional LoadingJournal of Periodontology, 2006
- The impact of conventional and implant supported prostheses on social and sexual activities in edentulous adultsJournal of Dentistry, 2005
- Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implantsClinical Oral Implants Research, 2004
- The McGill Consensus Statement on Overdentures Mandibular two‐implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patientsGerodontology, 2002
- Patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdenturesInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1997
- Patient satisfaction and chewing ability with implant-retained mandibular overdentures: A comparison with new complete dentures with or without preprosthetic surgeryJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1995
- Demographical, odontological, and psychological variables in individuals referred for osseointegrated dental implantsCommunity Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 1992