Short Scales – Five Misunderstandings and Ways to Overcome Them
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2014
- journal article
- Published by Hogrefe Publishing Group in Journal of Individual Differences
- Vol. 35 (4) , 185-189
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Testing the Assumption of Uncorrelated Errors for Short Scales by Means of Structural Equation ModelingJournal of Individual Differences, 2014
- Assessing Individual Change Using Short Tests and QuestionnairesApplied Psychological Measurement, 2013
- Shortening the S-STAI: Consequences for research and clinical practiceJournal of Psychosomatic Research, 2013
- Entwicklung und Validierung einer ultrakurzen Operationalisierung des Konstrukts Optimismus-PessimismusDiagnostica, 2013
- On the Shortcomings of Shortened Tests: A Literature ReviewInternational Journal of Testing, 2013
- Test Length and Decision Quality in Personnel Selection: When Is Short Too Short?International Journal of Testing, 2012
- An evaluation of the consequences of using short measures of the Big Five personality traits.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2012
- On the consistency of individual classification using short scales.Psychological Methods, 2007
- An Abductive Theory of Scientific Method.Psychological Methods, 2005
- My Current Thoughts on Coefficient Alpha and Successor ProceduresEducational and Psychological Measurement, 2004