Myofunctional therapy in sleep disorders: a systematic review
Authors:
- Sabina SaccomannoSabina Saccomanno
- Cristina ValeriCVCristina Valeri
- Mario PalermitiMario Palermiti
- Simone Ettore SalvatiSSSimone Ettore Salvati
- Francesco InchingoloFrancesco Inchingolo
- Laura FerranteLFLaura Ferrante
- Alessio Danilo InchingoloAlessio Danilo Inchingolo
- Andrea PalermoAPAndrea Palermo
- Gaetano IsolaGaetano Isola
- Gianna DipalmaGianna Dipalma
- Angelo Michele InchingoloAngelo Michele Inchingolo
Open Access
- 1 April 2026
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Open Exploration Publishing in Exploration of Medicine
- Vol. 7, 1001396
Abstract
Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a syndrome characterized by episodes of complete cessation of breathing (apnea) or inadequate breathing (hypopnea) during sleep. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Lilacs databases was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We identified 1,532 records; after screening, 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), published between 2009 and 2020, met the inclusion criteria. These studies included 698 participants aged 5–75 years. Results: Nine randomized trials (n = 698; 2009–2020) showed that myofunctional therapy (MFT), alone or as an adjunct, for example, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and nasal washing, reduced apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) versus control in adults and children. Snoring intensity improved in trials that measured it; several studies reported gains in oxygen saturation and mouth-breathing reduction. Protocols targeted the soft palate, tongue, and facial muscles with daily home exercises. Discussion: MFT appears to be a promising non-invasive treatment for reducing AHI, especially in pediatric patients. Its benefits extend beyond AHI reduction, supporting orofacial function and nasal breathing. However, its clinical integration remains limited due to a lack of standardized protocols and inconsistent reporting of patient adherence. Most studies also have short follow-up periods, which makes it difficult to assess long-term efficacy. To advance evidence-based use of MFT, future research should adopt standardized outcomes, monitor adherence systematically, and include long-term follow-up.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effect of orofacial myofunctional therapy on biometrics and compliance of positive airway pressure therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apneaSleep and Breathing, 2025
- International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep ApneaInternational Forum of Allergy & Rhinology, 2023
- The effectiveness of oropharyngeal exercises compared to inspiratory muscle training in obstructive sleep apnea: A randomized controlled trialHeart & Lung, 2020
- Development and evaluation of myofunctional therapy support program (MTSP) based on self-efficacy theory for patients with obstructive sleep apneaSleep and Breathing, 2019
- Changes in craniofacial and airway morphology as well as quality of life after passive myofunctional therapy in children with obstructive sleep apnea: a comparative cohort studySleep and Breathing, 2019
- Can myofunctional therapy increase tongue tone and reduce symptoms in children with sleep-disordered breathing?Sleep and Breathing, 2017
- Diagnostic clinique du syndrome d’apnées obstructives du sommeil de l’enfantArchives de Pédiatrie, 2017
- Myofunctional therapy improves adherence to continuous positive airway pressure treatmentSleep and Breathing, 2016
- Oropharyngeal exercises to reduce symptoms of OSA after ATSleep and Breathing, 2014
- Class II correction with magnets and superelastic coils followed by straight-wire mechanotherapyJournal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 1998