Lessons learned from implementation of a computerized application for pending tests at hospital discharge
Authors:
- Anuj K. DalalADAnuj K. Dalal
- Eric G. PoonEPEric G. Poon
- Andrew S. KarsonAKAndrew S. Karson
- Tejal K. GandhiTGTejal K. Gandhi
- Christopher L. RoyCRChristopher L. Roy
- 15 November 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Hospital Medicine
- Vol. 6 (1) , 16-21
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients are often discharged from the hospital before test results are finalized. Awareness of these results is poor and therefore an important patient safety concern. Few computerized systems have been deployed at care transitions to address this problem. We describe an attempt to implement a computerized application to help inpatient physicians manage these test results.METHODS: We modified an ambulatory electronic medical record (EMR)‐based results management application to track pending tests at hospital discharge (Hospitalist Results Manager, HRM). We trained inpatient physicians at 2 academic medical centers to track these tests using this application. We surveyed inpatient physicians regarding usage of and satisfaction with the application, barriers to use, and the characteristics of an ideal system to track pending tests at discharge.RESULTS: Of 29 survey respondents, 14 (48%) reported never using HRM, and 13 (45%) used it 1 to 2 times per week. A total of 23 (79%) reported barriers prohibiting use, including being inundated with clinically “irrelevant” results, not having sufficient time, and a lack of integration of post‐discharge test result management into usual workflow. Twenty‐one (72%) wanted to receive notification of abnormal and clinician‐designated pending test results. Twenty‐seven physicians (93%) agreed that an ideally designed computerized application would be valuable for managing pending tests at discharge.CONCLUSIONS: Although inpatient physicians would highly value a computerized application to manage pending tests at discharge, the characteristics of an ideal system are unclear and there are important barriers prohibiting adoption and optimal usage of such systems. We outline suggestions for future electronic systems to manage pending tests at discharge. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2011. © 2010 Society of Hospital Medicine.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adequacy of Hospital Discharge Summaries in Documenting Tests with Pending Results and Outpatient Follow-up ProvidersJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2009
- Promoting effective transitions of care at hospital discharge: A review of key issues for hospitalistsJournal of Hospital Medicine, 2007
- The Continuing Problem of Missed Test Results in an Integrated Health System with an Advanced Electronic Medical RecordThe Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 2007
- Deficits in Communication and Information Transfer Between Hospital-Based and Primary Care PhysiciansJAMA, 2007
- Patient Safety Concerns Arising from Test Results That Return after Hospital DischargeAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2005
- Lost in Transition: Challenges and Opportunities for Improving the Quality of Transitional CareAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2004
- Medical errors related to discontinuity of care from an inpatient to an outpatient settingJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2003
- The Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events Affecting Patients after Discharge from the HospitalAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2003
- Key legal principles for hospitalistsThe American Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Passing the clinical baton: 6 principles to guide the hospitalistThe American Journal of Medicine, 2001