Predicting and Mapping the Average Hydrologic Response for the Eastern United States
Authors:
- James F. WoodruffJWJames F. Woodruff
- John D. HewlettJHJohn D. Hewlett
- 1 October 1970
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Water Resources Research
- Vol. 6 (5) , 1312-1326
Abstract
An attempt was made to predict the average annual hydrologic response (ratio of annual direct runoff to annual precipitation) of ungaged watersheds in the East by regression against 15 planimetric, hypsometric, and land use factors available on 90 selected test basins (2 to 100 square miles) from New York to Alabama. The regression coefficients were nonsignificant indicating that the average percentage of a basin's annual precipitation that will become quick flow cannot be predicted from available basin morphometry and implying that response is controlled chiefly by porous mantle factors not measurable on normal data sources. A hydrologic response map of the eastern United States based on an expanded set of 201 basins up to 200 square miles revealed specific regions of high flood producing potential clearly related to geologic provinces. It is suggested that hydrologic response is a meaningful parameter that may be best derived by measuring precipitation and streamflow by cheap, short‐term methods traditionally rejected as uneconomical.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- A HYDROLOGIC RESPONSE MAP FOR THE STATE OF GEORGIA1Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1967
- Some relations between streamflow characteristics and the environment in the Delaware River regionProfessional Paper, 1963
- Quantitative Geomorphology of Some Watersheds in the Appalachian PlateauGeological Society of America Bulletin, 1962
- A Simplified Approximation for the Hypsometric IntegralThe Journal of Geology, 1959
- Rainfall and topographic factors that affect runoffEOS, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 1953
- HYPSOMETRIC (AREA-ALTITUDE) ANALYSIS OF EROSIONAL TOPOGRAPHYGeological Society of America Bulletin, 1952