Improvement of best practice in early breast cancer: actionable surgeon and hospital factors
Authors:
- 7 October 2006
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
- Vol. 102 (2) , 219-226
Abstract
To identify actionable elements for improving best practice, this study examined the relative effects of patient, surgeon and hospital factors on surgical treatment variation of 2,929 early breast cancer patients, diagnosed from January 1998 to January 2002 in the region of the Comprehensive Cancer Centre North-Netherlands. Multilevel logistic regression was used to analyze the hierarchically structured data. Apart from the patient level, 43.3% of the treatment variation was due to the hospital and 56.7% to the surgeon, after adjustment for patient characteristics. Although hospital factors like volume, teaching status, and management and policy contributed to this variation, multidisciplinary care seemed the most important actionable hospital factor. Although the surgeon was shown to be an important starting point for quality improvement, actionable elements seemed difficult to identify as factors like surgeon experience and volume were not conclusive and significant variance on this level remained (σ2 = 0.149, SE 0.053). We conclude that multidisciplinary care can improve best practice and that further research into actionable surgeon factors is needed.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Guideline adherence for early breast cancer before and after introduction of the sentinel node biopsyBritish Journal of Cancer, 2005
- Quality of Life Following Breast-Conserving Therapy or Mastectomy: Results of a 5-Year Prospective StudyThe Breast Journal, 2004
- Access to multidisciplinary cancer careCancer, 2004
- Meeting Highlights: Updated International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Factors Predicting the Use of Breast-Conserving Therapy in Stage I and II Breast CarcinomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- Reanalysis and Results after 12 Years of Follow-up in a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Total Mastectomy with Lumpectomy with or without Irradiation in the Treatment of Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Does it matter where you live? Treatment variation for breast cancer in YorkshireBritish Journal of Cancer, 1995
- Factors influencing local relapse and survival and results of salvage treatment after breast-conserving therapy in operable breast cancer: EORTC trial 10801, breast conservation compared with mastectomy in TNM stage I and II breast cancerEuropean Journal of Cancer, 1992
- Geographic Variation in the Use of Breast-Conserving Treatment for Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- The impact of breast-conserving treatment and mastectomy on the quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients: a review.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1991