Epistemic Functions of Replicability in Experimental Sciences: Defending the Orthodox View
Open Access
- 18 February 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Foundations of Science
- Vol. 29 (4) , 1071-1088
Abstract
Replicability is widely regarded as one of the defining features of science and its pursuit is one of the main postulates of meta-research, a discipline emerging in response to the replicability crisis. At the same time, replicability is typically treated with caution by philosophers of science. In this paper, we reassess the value of replicability from an epistemic perspective. We defend the orthodox view, according to which replications are always epistemically useful, against the more prudent view that claims that it is useful in very limited circumstances. Additionally, we argue that we can learn more about the original experiment and the limits of the discovered effect from replications at different levels. We hold that replicability is a crucial feature of experimental results and scientists should continue to strive to secure it.Keywords
Funding Information
- Narodowe Centrum Nauki (grant number 2019/35/B/HS1/03281)
- H2020 European Research Council (640638)
- Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Value of Direct ReplicationPerspectives on Psychological Science, 2014
- Registered Reports: A new publishing initiative at CortexCortex, 2013
- Scientific UtopiaPerspectives on Psychological Science, 2012
- Statistically significant meta-analyses of clinical trials have modest credibility and inflated effectsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of psi: Comment on Bem (2011).Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2011
- Bias and values in scientific researchStudies in History and Philosophy of Science, 2009
- Why Most Discovered True Associations Are InflatedEpidemiology, 2008
- Why Most Published Research Findings Are FalsePLOS Medicine, 2005
- The experimenters' regress: from skepticism to argumentationStudies in History and Philosophy of Science, 2002
- Making scientific computations reproducibleComputing in Science & Engineering, 2000