The Ground-Motion Characterization Model for the 2022 New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model
Authors:
- Brendon A. BradleyBrendon A. Bradley
- Sanjay S. BoraSanjay S. Bora
- Robin L. LeeRobin L. Lee
- Elena F. ManeaElena F. Manea
- Matthew C. GerstenbergerMatthew C. Gerstenberger
- Peter J. StaffordPeter J. Stafford
- Gail M. AtkinsonGail M. Atkinson
- Graeme WeatherillGraeme Weatherill
- Jesse HutchinsonJHJesse Hutchinson
- Christopher A. de la TorreCTChristopher A. de la Torre
- Anne M. HulseyAHAnne M. Hulsey
- Anna E. KaiserAnna E. Kaiser
- 27 December 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Seismological Society of America (SSA) in Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
- Vol. 114 (1) , 329-349
Abstract
This article summarizes the ground-motion characterization (GMC) model component of the 2022 New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model (2022 NZ NSHM). The model development process included establishing a NZ-specific context through the creation of a new ground-motion database, and consideration of alternative ground-motion models (GMMs) that have been historically used in NZ or have been recently developed for global application with or without NZ-specific regionalizations. Explicit attention was given to models employing state-of-the-art approaches in terms of their ability to provide robust predictions when extrapolated beyond the predictor variable scenarios that are well constrained by empirical data alone. We adopted a “hybrid” logic tree that combined both a “weights-on-models” approach along with backbone models (i.e., metamodels), the former being the conventional approach to GMC logic tree modeling for NSHM applications using published models, and the latter being increasingly used in research literature and site-specific studies. In this vein, two NZ-specific GMMs were developed employing the backbone model construct. All of the adopted subduction GMMs in the logic tree were further modified from their published versions to include the effects of increased attenuation in the back-arc region; and, all but one model was modified to account for the reduction in ground-motion standard deviations as a result of nonlinear surficial site response. As well as being based on theoretical arguments, these adjustments were implemented as a result of hazard sensitivity analyses using models without these effects, which we consider gave unrealistically high hazard estimates.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- A New Zealand-Specific Pseudospectral Acceleration Ground-Motion Prediction Equation for Active Shallow Crustal Earthquakes Based on Foreign ModelsBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2013
- Consideration and Propagation of Epistemic Uncertainties in New Zealand Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard AnalysisBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2012
- National Seismic Hazard Model for New Zealand: 2010 UpdateBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2012
- Ground‐Motion Attenuation Model for Small‐To‐Moderate Shallow Crustal Earthquakes in California and Its Implications on Regionalization of Ground‐Motion Prediction ModelsEarthquake Spectra, 2010
- Orientation-Independent, Nongeometric-Mean Measures of Seismic Intensity from Two Horizontal Components of MotionBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2010
- Nonlinear Site Response Effects on the Standard Deviations of Predicted Ground MotionsBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2010
- Why Do Modern Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Analyses Often Lead to Increased Hazard Estimates?Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2006
- Attenuation Relations of Strong Ground Motion in Japan Using Site Classification Based on Predominant PeriodBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2006
- A New Seismic Hazard Model for New ZealandBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2002
- Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis without the Ergodic AssumptionSeismological Research Letters, 1999