Experience and rationality under risk: re-examining the impact of sampling experience

Authors:
Open Access
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
A recent strand of the literature on decision-making under uncertainty has pointed to an intriguing behavioral gap between decisions made from description and decisions made from experience. This study reinvestigates this description-experience gap to understand the impact that sampling experience has on decisions under risk. Our study adopts a complete sampling paradigm to address the lack of control over experienced probabilities by requiring complete sampling without replacement. We also address the roles of utilities and ambiguity, which are central in most current decision models in economics. Thus, our experiment identifies the deviations from expected utility due to over- (or under-) weighting of probabilities. Our results confirm the existence of the behavioral gap, but they provide no evidence for the underweighting of small probabilities within the complete sampling treatment. We find that sampling experience attenuates rather than reverses the inverse S-shaped probability weighting under risk.
Keywords
Funding Information
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (406-13-093)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (71903006)
  • European Research Council (336703)

This publication has 90 references indexed in Scilit: