Does Simulation Training Improve the Accuracy of Vaginal Assessment of Labour Progress?

Authors:
Open Access
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
To measure the utility of the Simulation training model for training purposes over and above conventional methods of training for vaginal assessment during labour. The study group included undergraduate trainees, and the control group included postgraduate trainees and qualified personnel, i.e. senior registrars and consultants. Participants from the study group were trained for vaginal assessment on the simulation training model. Then both the groups were tested on the model for accuracy in estimating each value of cervical dilatation and fetal station. Mean cervical dilatation and station accuracy scores were noted, and comparative analysis was done between the study and control groups. A total of 150 participants were included. The overall mean dilatation and station accuracy scores of a model trained study group participants were better than subjectively trained control group participants. Study group participants showed greater accuracy for smaller dilatations, i.e. 1, 2, 3, 4cm and middle dilatation, i.e. 5cm and 6cm (p value=<0.05). In contrast, comparing the two groups for higher dilatations from 6 to 10 cm did not show any statistical significance. Study group participants also showed greater accuracy for all the fetal stations except stations 0 and +1. The simulation training model can be considered an in vitro training device to improve the trainees' understanding of cervical dilatation and fetal station and can be made a part of a routine obstetric teaching program.

This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit: