Scientific and Logistical Considerations When Screening for Radiation Risks by Using Biodosimetry Based on Biological Effects of Radiation Rather than Dose: The Need for Prior Measurements of Homogeneity and Distribution of Dose
- 1 July 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Health Physics
- Vol. 119 (1) , 72-82
Abstract
An effective medical response to a large-scale radiation event requires prompt and effective initial triage so that appropriate care can be provided to individuals with significant risk for severe acute radiation injury. Arguably, it would be advantageous to use injury rather than radiation dose for the initial assessment; i.e., use bioassays of biological damage. Such assays would be based on changes in intrinsic biological response elements; e.g., up- or down-regulation of genes, proteins, metabolites, blood cell counts, chromosomal aberrations, micronuclei, micro-RNA, cytokines, or transcriptomes. Using a framework to evaluate the feasibility of biodosimetry for triaging up to a million people in less than a week following a major radiation event, Part 1 analyzes the logistical feasibility and clinical needs for ensuring that biomarkers of organ-specific injury could be effectively used in this context. We conclude that the decision to use biomarkers of organ-specific injury would greatly benefit by first having independent knowledge of whether the person’s exposure was heterogeneous and, if so, what was the dose distribution (to determine which organs were exposed to high doses). In Part 2, we describe how these two essential needs for prior information (heterogeneity and dose distribution) could be obtained by using in vivo nail dosimetry. This novel physical biodosimetry method can also meet the needs for initial triage, providing non-invasive, point-of-care measurements made by non-experts with immediate dose estimates for four separate anatomical sites. Additionally, it uniquely provides immediate information as to whether the exposure was homogeneous and, if not, it can estimate the dose distribution. We conclude that combining the capability of methods such as in vivo EPR nail dosimetry with bioassays to predict organ-specific damage would allow effective use of medical resources to save lives.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Dosimetry for a Large-Scale Radiation IncidentHealth Physics, 2012
- The capacity, capabilities and needs of the WHO biodosenet member laboratoriesRadiation Protection Dosimetry, 2012
- Biological dosimetry by the triage dicentric chromosome assay – Further validation of international networkingRadiation Measurements, 2011
- A framework for comparative evaluation of dosimetric methods to triage a large population following a radiological eventRadiation Measurements, 2011
- Transverse fingernail curvature in adults: a quantitative evaluation and the influence of gender, age, and hand size and dominanceInternational Journal of Cosmetic Science, 2011
- DOSIMETRY BASED ON EPR SPECTRAL ANALYSIS OF FINGERNAIL CLIPPINGSHealth Physics, 2010
- TRIAGE DOSE ASSESSMENT FOR PARTIAL-BODY EXPOSURE: DICENTRIC ANALYSISHealth Physics, 2010
- Synopsis of Partial-Body Radiation Diagnostic Biomarkers and Medical Management of Radiation Injury WorkshopRadiation Research, 2010
- Development of Gene Expression Signatures for Practical Radiation BiodosimetryInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics (IJROBP), 2008
- Relation between organ and whole body doses and local doses measured by ESR for standard and realistic neutron and photon external overexposuresRadiation Protection Dosimetry, 2006