Prosodic Phrasing and theThat-Trace Effect
- 1 April 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MIT Press in Linguistic Inquiry
- Vol. 47 (2) , 333-349
Abstract
We propose here a new PF account of the that-trace effect. Adopting the phase-based theory of the syntax-phonology interface and independent principles of prosodic restructuring, we propose that the complementizer that cannot form a prosodic phrase on its own. We show that this analysis straightforwardly derives the core paradigm surrounding the that-trace effect and its well-documented exceptions triggered by focus, adverbs, parentheticals, resumption, and right node raising. We further argue that the relevant prosodic condition can be derived from the interaction of the Lexical Category Condition ( Truckenbrodt 1999 ) with Prosodic Vacuity ( Kandybowicz 2015 ), within the Match Theory of syntax-prosody correspondence ( Selkirk 2011 ).Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rescue by PF Deletion, Traces as (Non)interveners, and the That-Trace EffectLinguistic Inquiry, 2011
- Clauses in Noncanonical Positions at the Syntax‐Phonology InterfaceSyntax, 2007
- Phase theory and prosodic spellout: The case of verbsThe Linguistic Review, 2007
- The Comp-trace effect, the adverb effect and minimal CPJournal of Linguistics, 2002
- On the Relation between Syntactic Phrases and Phonological PhrasesLinguistic Inquiry, 1999
- The phonology of Focus and Topic in ItalianThe Linguistic Review, 1997
- The Representation of Disjunct ConstituentsLanguage, 1991
- The accessibility of Universal Grammar in adult language learningInterlanguage studies bulletin (Utrecht), 1988
- The Arbitrary Basis of Transformational GrammarLanguage, 1972
- Global RulesLanguage, 1970