Repetition effects in visual search
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Perception & Psychophysics
- Vol. 62 (4) , 800-817
Abstract
Maljkovie and Nakayama (1994) demonstrated an automatic benefit of repeating the defining feature of the target in search guided by salience. Thus, repetition influences target selection in search guided by bottom-up factors. Four experiments demonstrate this repetition effect in search guided by top-down factors, and so the repetition effect is not merely part of the mechanism for determining what display elements are salient. The effect is replicated in singleton search and in three situations requiring different degrees of top-down guidance: when the feature defining the target is less salient than the feature defining the response, when there is more than one singleton in the defining dimension, and when the target is defined by a conjunction of features. Repetition does not change the priorities of targets, relative to distractors: Display size affects search equally whether the target is repeated or changed. More than one mechanism may underlie the repetition effect in different experiments, but assuming that there is a unitary mechanism, a short-term episodic memory mechanism is proposed.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial AttentionCognitive Psychology, 1998
- Goal-directed guidance of attention: Evidence from conjunctive visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1997
- Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capturePerception & Psychophysics, 1994
- Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review, 1989
- Searching for conjunctively defined targets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1984
- Wholistic and Analytic Stimulus Processing: The Development of Selective Perceptual StrategiesThe Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 1981
- Reaction times to new versus repeated signals in a serial task as a function of response-signal time intervalActa Psychologica, 1966
- Serial Choice Reaction-time as a Function of Response versus Signal-and-Response RepetitionNature, 1965
- S-R relationships and reaction times to new versus repeated signals in a serial task.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963
- Sequential Redundancy and Speed in a Serial Two-Choice Responding TaskQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961