Limb-salvage reconstruction following resection of pelvic bone sarcomas involving the acetabulum
- 1 April 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery in The Bone & Joint Journal
- Vol. 103-B (4) , 795-803
Abstract
Aims: Limb salvage for pelvic sarcomas involving the acetabulum is a major surgical challenge. There remains no consensus about what is the optimum type of reconstruction after resection of the tumour. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes in these patients according to the methods of periacetabular reconstruction. Methods: The study involved a consecutive series of 122 patients with a periacetabular bone sarcoma who underwent limb-salvage surgery involving a custom-made prosthesis in 65 (53%), an ice-cream cone prosthesis in 21 (17%), an extracorporeal irradiated autograft in 18 (15%), and nonskeletal reconstruction in 18 (15%). Results: The rates of major complications necessitating further surgery were 62%, 24%, 56%, and 17% for custom-made prostheses, ice-cream cone prostheses, irradiated autografts and nonskeletal reconstructions, respectively (p = 0.001). The ten-year cumulative incidence of failure of the reconstruction was 19%, 9%, 33%, and 0%, respectively. The major cause of failure was deep infection (11%), followed by local recurrence (6%). The mean functional Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) scores were 59%, 74%, 64%, and 72%, respectively. The scores were significantly lower in patients with major complications than in those without complications (mean 52% (SD 20%) vs 74% (SD 19%); p < 0.001). For periacetabular resections involving the ilium, the mean score was the highest with custom-made prostheses (82% (SD 10%)) in patients without any major complication; however, nonskeletal reconstruction resulted in the highest mean scores (78% (SD 12%)) in patients who had major complications. For periacetabular resections not involving the ilium, significantly higher mean scores were obtained with ice-cream cone prostheses (79% (SD 17%); p = 0.031). Conclusion: Functional outcome following periacetabular reconstruction is closely associated with the occurrence of complications requiring further surgery. For tumours treated with periacetabular and iliac resection, skeletal reconstruction may result in the best outcomes in the absence of complications, whereas nonskeletal reconstruction is a reasonable option if the risk of complications is high. For tumours requiring periacetabular resection without the ilium, reconstruction using an ice-cream cone prosthesis supported by antibiotic-laden cement is a reliable option. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(4):795–803.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Functional outcomes and gait analysis of patients after periacetabular sarcoma resection with and without ischiofemoral arthrodesisJournal of Surgical Oncology, 2012
- Hip transposition as a limb salvage procedure following the resection of periacetabular tumorsJournal of Surgical Oncology, 2010
- Periacetabular Reconstruction with a New EndoprosthesisClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2009
- Hip transposition as a universal surgical procedure for periacetabular tumors of the pelvisJournal of Surgical Oncology, 2008
- Peri-acetabular resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction for tumours of the acetabulumThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2008
- Complications and functional evaluation of 17 saddle prostheses for resection of periacetabular tumors*Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2001
- Surgical Treatment of Pelvic SarcomasClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2001
- Prognostic factors for patients with sarcomas of the pelvic bonesCancer, 1998
- Limb Salvage in Periacetabular SarcomasClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1996
- High complication rates with pelvic allografts: Experience of 22 sarcoma resectionsActa Orthopaedica, 1996