Patient Engagement Practices in Clinical Research among Patient Groups, Industry, and Academia in the United States: A Survey
Authors:
Open Access
- 14 October 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 10 (10) , e0140232
Abstract
Patient-centered clinical trial design and execution is becoming increasingly important. No best practice guidelines exist despite a key stakeholder declaration to create more effective engagement models. This study aims to gain a better understanding of attitudes and practices for engaging patient groups so that actionable recommendations may be developed. Individuals from industry, academic institutions, and patient groups were identified through Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative and Drug Information Association rosters and mailing lists. Objectives, practices, and perceived barriers related to engaging patient groups in the planning, conduct, and interpretation of clinical trials were reported in an online survey. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis of survey data followed a literature review to inform survey questions. Survey respondents (n = 179) valued the importance of involving patient groups in research; however, patient group respondents valued their contributions to research protocol development, funding acquisition, and interpretation of study results more highly than those contributions were valued by industry and academic respondents (all p < .001). Patient group respondents placed higher value in open communications, clear expectations, and detailed contract execution than did non–patient group respondents (all p < .05). Industry and academic respondents more often cited internal bureaucratic processes and reluctance to share information as engagement barriers than did patient group respondents (all p < .01). Patient groups reported that a lack of transparency and understanding of the benefits of collaboration on the part of industry and academia were greater barriers than did non–patient group respondents (all p< .01). Despite reported similarities among approaches to engagement by the three stakeholder groups, key differences exist in perceived barriers and benefits to partnering with patient groups among the sectors studied. This recognition could inform the development of best practices for patient-centered clinical trial design and execution. Additional research is needed to define and optimize key success factors.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Caregiver Preferences for Emerging Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Treatments: A Comparison of Best-Worst Scaling and Conjoint AnalysisThe Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2014
- A Community-Engaged Approach to Quantifying Caregiver Preferences for the Benefits and Risks of Emerging Therapies for Duchenne Muscular DystrophyClinical Therapeutics, 2014
- Foundation-Industry Relationships - A New Business Model Joint-Venture Philanthropy in Therapy DevelopmentCurrent Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, 2014
- Therapeutic Development Paths for Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's Disease: Report of a Regulatory RoundtableJournal of Parkinson’s Disease, 2014
- Forging Stronger Partnerships Between Academic Health Centers and Patient-Driven OrganizationsAcademic Medicine, 2013
- How disease advocacy organizations participate in clinical research: a survey of genetic organizationsGenetics in Medicine, 2012
- Social Uses of Personal Health Information Within PatientsLikeMe, an Online Patient Community: What Can Happen When Patients Have Access to One Another’s DataJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2008
- The cystic fibrosis therapeutics development network (CF TDN): a paradigm of a clinical trials network for genetic and orphan diseasesAdvanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2002