Contamination of Medical Charts: An Important Source of Potential Infection in Hospitals
Authors:
Open Access
- 18 February 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 9 (2) , e78512
Abstract
This prospective study aims to identify and compare the incidence of bacterial contamination of hospital charts and the distribution of species responsible for chart contamination in different units of a tertiary hospital. All beds in medical, surgical, pediatric, and obstetric-gynecologic general wards (556) and those in corresponding special units (125) including medical, surgical, pediatric intensive care units (ICUs), the obstetric tocolytic unit and delivery room were surveyed for possible chart contamination. The outer surfaces of included charts were sampled by one experienced investigator with sterile cotton swabs rinsed with normal saline. For general wards and special units, the overall sampling rates were 81.8% (455/556) and 85.6% (107/125) (p = 0.316); the incidence of chart contamination was 63.5% and 83.2%, respectively (p0.05). Special units had a significantly higher incidence of bacterial contamination due to Staphylococcus aureus (17.8%), Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (9.3%), Streptococcus viridans (9.4%), Escherichia coli (11.2%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (7.5%), and Acinetobacter baumannii (7.5%). Logistic regression analysis revealed the incidence of chart contamination was 2- to 4-fold higher in special units than in general wards [odds ratios: 1.97–4.00]. Noting that most hospital charts are contaminated, our study confirms that a hospital chart is not only a medical record but also an important source of potential infection. The plastic cover of the medical chart can harbor potential pathogens, thus acting as a vector of bacteria. Additionally, chart contamination is more common in ICUs. These findings highlight the importance of effective hand-washing before and after handling medical charts. However, managers and clinical staff should pay more attention to the issue and may consider some interventions.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do mobile phones of patients, companions and visitors carry multidrug-resistant hospital pathogens?American Journal of Infection Control, 2011
- Mobile phone technology and hospitalized patients: a cross-sectional surveillance study of bacterial colonization, and patient opinions and behavioursClinical Microbiology and Infection, 2011
- Influence of a hygiene promotion programme on infection control in an intensive-care unitClinical Microbiology and Infection, 2011
- Bacterial colonization on writing pens touched by healthcare professionals and hospitalized patients with and without cleaning the pen with alcohol-based hand sanitizing agentClinical Microbiology and Infection, 2011
- When did the doctors become fomites?Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 2011
- Relationship between prevalence of device-associated infections and alcohol-based hand-rub consumption: a multi-level approachJournal of Hospital Infection, 2011
- Compliance with hand hygiene on surgical, medical, and neurologic intensive care units: Direct observation versus calculated disinfectant usageAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2009
- A Prospective Study of the Case-Notes of MRSA-Positive Patients: A Vehicle of MRSA SpreadThe Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2007
- Patients' case-notes: look but don't touchJournal of Hospital Infection, 2003
- Bacterial flora on the white coats of medical studentsJournal of Hospital Infection, 2000