Expanding Access to BRCA1/2 Genetic Counseling with Telephone Delivery: A Cluster Randomized Trial
Authors:
- Anita Y. KinneyAKAnita Y. Kinney
- Karin M. ButlerKBKarin M. Butler
- Marc D. SchwartzMSMarc D. Schwartz
- Jeanne S. MandelblattJMJeanne S. Mandelblatt
- Kenneth M. BoucherKBKenneth M. Boucher
- Lisa M. PappasLPLisa M. Pappas
- Amanda GammonAGAmanda Gammon
- Wendy KohlmannWKWendy Kohlmann
- Sandra L. EdwardsSESandra L. Edwards
- Antoinette M. StroupASAntoinette M. Stroup
- Saundra S. BuysSBSaundra S. Buys
- Kristina G. FloresKFKristina G. Flores
Open Access
- 7 October 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Vol. 106 (12) , dju328
Abstract
The growing demand for cancer genetic services underscores the need to consider approaches that enhance access and efficiency of genetic counseling. Telephone delivery of cancer genetic services may improve access to these services for individuals experiencing geographic (rural areas) and structural (travel time, transportation, childcare) barriers to access. This cluster-randomized clinical trial used population-based sampling of women at risk for BRCA1/2 mutations to compare telephone and in-person counseling for: 1) equivalency of testing uptake and 2) noninferiority of changes in psychosocial measures. Women 25 to 74 years of age with personal or family histories of breast or ovarian cancer and who were able to travel to one of 14 outreach clinics were invited to participate. Randomization was by family. Assessments were conducted at baseline one week after pretest and post-test counseling and at six months. Of the 988 women randomly assigned, 901 completed a follow-up assessment. Cluster bootstrap methods were used to estimate the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference between test uptake proportions, using a 10% equivalency margin. Differences in psychosocial outcomes for determining noninferiority were estimated using linear models together with one-sided 97.5% bootstrap CIs. Uptake of BRCA1/2 testing was lower following telephone (21.8%) than in-person counseling (31.8%, difference = 10.2%, 95% CI = 3.9% to 16.3%; after imputation of missing data: difference = 9.2%, 95% CI = -0.1% to 24.6%). Telephone counseling fulfilled the criteria for noninferiority to in-person counseling for all measures. BRCA1/2 telephone counseling, although leading to lower testing uptake, appears to be safe and as effective as in-person counseling with regard to minimizing adverse psychological reactions, promoting informed decision making, and delivering patient-centered communication for both rural and urban women.Keywords
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cancer Risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: Results From Prospective Analysis of EMBRACEJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2013
- Reporting of Noninferiority and Equivalence Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2012
- Barriers and Facilitators for Utilization of Genetic Counseling and Risk Assessment Services in Young Female Breast Cancer SurvivorsJournal of Cancer Epidemiology, 2012
- Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trialsBMJ, 2012
- Reported referral for genetic counseling or BRCA 1/2 testing among United States physiciansCancer, 2011
- Genetic counselor opinions of, and experiences with telephone communication of BRCA1/2 test resultsClinical Genetics, 2010
- Cancer risks in carriers of the BRCA1/2 Ashkenazi founder mutationsJournal of Medical Genetics, 2007
- SF-36 Health Survey UpdateSpine, 2000
- Genetic Heterogeneity and Penetrance Analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes in Breast Cancer FamiliesThe American Journal of Human Genetics, 1998
- Anxiety and Performance: The Processing Efficiency TheoryCognition and Emotion, 1992