Ovarian imaging radiomics quality score assessment: an EuSoMII radiomics auditing group initiative
Open Access
- 27 October 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Radiology
- Vol. 33 (3) , 2239-2247
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the methodological rigor of radiomics-based studies using noninvasive imaging in ovarian setting. Methods: Multiple medical literature archives (PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus) were searched to retrieve original studies focused on computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound (US), or positron emission tomography (PET) radiomics for ovarian disorders’ assessment. Two researchers in consensus evaluated each investigation using the radiomics quality score (RQS). Subgroup analyses were performed to assess whether the total RQS varied according to first author category, study aim and topic, imaging modality, and journal quartile. Results: From a total of 531 items, 63 investigations were finally included in the analysis. The studies were greatly focused (94%) on the field of oncology, with CT representing the most used imaging technique (41%). Overall, the papers achieved a median total RQS 6 (IQR, −0.5 to 11), corresponding to a percentage of 16.7% of the maximum score (IQR, 0–30.6%). The scoring was low especially due to the lack of prospective design and formal validation of the results. At subgroup analysis, the 4 studies not focused on oncological topic showed significantly lower quality scores than the others. Conclusions: The overall methodological rigor of radiomics studies in the ovarian field is still not ideal, limiting the reproducibility of results and potential translation to clinical setting. More efforts towards a standardized methodology in the workflow are needed to allow radiomics to become a viable tool for clinical decision-making. Key Points: • The 63 included studies using noninvasive imaging for ovarian applications were mostly focused on oncologic topic (94%). • The included investigations achieved a median total RQS 6 (IQR, −0.5 to 11), indicating poor methodological rigor. • The RQS was low especially due to the lack of prospective design and formal validation of the results.Keywords
Funding Information
- Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Exploring Large-scale Public Medical Image DatasetsAcademic Radiology, 2020
- Quality of science and reporting of radiomics in oncologic studies: room for improvement according to radiomics quality score and TRIPOD statementEuropean Radiology, 2019
- Towards clinical application of image mining: a systematic review on artificial intelligence and radiomicsEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2019
- Magnetic resonance imaging radiomics in categorizing ovarian masses and predicting clinical outcome: a preliminary studyEuropean Radiology, 2019
- Radiomics: the facts and the challenges of image analysisEuropean Radiology Experimental, 2018
- Texture analysis and machine learning to characterize suspected thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: Where do we stand?European Journal of Radiology, 2018
- Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicineNature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2017
- Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are DataRadiology, 2016
- Radiomics: the process and the challengesMagnetic Resonance Imaging, 2012
- Multi-stage Learning for Robust Lung Segmentation in Challenging CT Volumes2011