Support for a metapopulation structure among mammals
- 1 July 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Mammal Review
- Vol. 39 (3) , 178-192
Abstract
The metapopulation metaphor is increasingly used to explain the spatial dynamics of animal populations. However, metapopulation structure is difficult to identify in long‐lived species that are widely distributed in stochastic environments, where they can resist extinctions. The literature on mammals may not provide supporting evidence for classic metapopulation dynamics, which call for the availability of discrete habitat patches, asynchrony in local population dynamics, evidence for extinction and colonization processes, and dispersal between local populations. Empirical evidence for metapopulation structure among mammals may exist when applying more lenient criteria. To meet these criteria, mammals should live in landscapes as discrete local breeding populations, and their demography should be asynchronous. We examined the literature for empirical evidence in support of the classical criteria set byHanski (1999), and for the more lenient subset of criteria proposed byElmhagen & Angerbjörn (2001). We suggest circumstances where metapopulation theory could be important in understanding population processes in mammals of different body sizes. The patchy distribution of large (>100 kg) mammals and dispersal often motivate inferences in support of a metapopulation structure. Published studies seldom address the full suite of classical criteria. However, studies on small mammals are more likely to record classic metapopulation criteria than those on large mammals. The slow turnover rate that is typical for medium‐sized and large mammals apparently makes it difficult to identify a metapopulation structure during studies of short duration. To identify a metapopulation structure, studies should combine the criteria set byHanski (1999) andElmhagen & Angerbjörn (2001). Mammals frequently live in fragmented landscapes, and processes involved in the maintenance of a metapopulation structure should be considered in conservation planning and management.Keywords
This publication has 90 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spatial Heterogeneity in Habitat Quality and Cross-Scale Interactions in MetapopulationsEcosystems, 2007
- Megaparks for metapopulations: Addressing the causes of locally high elephant numbers in southern AfricaBiological Conservation, 2007
- Designing a conservation reserve network with minimal fragmentation: A linear integer programming approachEnvironmental Modeling & Assessment, 2005
- The Conservation of Brazilian Reptiles: Challenges for a Megadiverse CountryConservation Biology, 2005
- Metapopulation dynamics of a flightless alpine insect Hemideina maori in a naturally fragmented habitatEcological Entomology, 2002
- Genetic Variability in mtDNA of the Silvery Gibbon: Implications for the Conservation of a Critically Endangered SpeciesConservation Biology, 2001
- DISPERSAL PATTERNS OF SAN JOAQUIN KIT FOXES (VULPES MACROTIS MUTICA)Journal of Mammalogy, 2000
- Landscape Analysis of Tiger Distribution and Habitat Quality in NepalConservation Biology, 1998
- A note on the distribution and abundance of puku, Kobus vardoni Livingstone, in Kasanka National Park, ZambiaAfrican Journal of Ecology, 1998
- Distribution of four-eyed opossum, Philander opossum (Marsupialia, Didelphidae) on small Islands in PanamaMammalia, 1996