Courage in Decision Making: A Mixed-Methods Study of COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake in Women of Reproductive Age in the U.K.
Authors:
- Laura A. MageeLMLaura A. Magee
- Julia R. BrownJBJulia R. Brown
- Vicky BowyerVBVicky Bowyer
- Gillian HorganGHGillian Horgan
- Harriet BouldingHBHarriet Boulding
- Asma KhalilAsma Khalil
- Nathan J. CheethamNCNathan J. Cheetham
- Nicholas R. HarveyNHNicholas R. Harvey
- COVID Symptom Study Biobank ConsortiumCCCOVID Symptom Study Biobank Consortium
- RESILIENT Study GroupRGRESILIENT Study Group
- Hiten D. MistryHMHiten D. Mistry
- Carole SudreCSCarole Sudre
Open Access
Abstract
COVID-19 vaccination rates are lower in women of reproductive age (WRA), including pregnant/postpartum women, despite their poorer COVID-19-related outcomes. We evaluated the vaccination experiences of 3568 U.K. WRA, including 1983 women (55.6%) experiencing a pandemic pregnancy, recruited through the ZOE COVID Symptom Study app. Two staggered online questionnaires (Oct–Dec 2021: 3453 responders; Aug–Sept 2022: 2129 responders) assessed reproductive status, COVID-19 status, vaccination, and attitudes for/against vaccination. Descriptive analyses included vaccination type(s), timing relative to age-based eligibility and reproductive status, vaccination delay (first vaccination >28 days from eligibility), and rationale, with content analysis of free-text comments. Most responders (3392/3453, 98.2%) were vaccinated by Dec 2021, motivated by altruism, vaccination supportiveness in general, low risk, and COVID-19 concerns. Few declined vaccination (by Sept/2022: 20/2129, 1.0%), citing risks (pregnancy-specific and longer-term), pre-existing immunity, and personal/philosophical reasons. Few women delayed vaccination, although pregnant/postpartum women (vs. other WRA) received vaccination later (median 3 vs. 0 days after eligibility, p < 0.0001). Despite high uptake, concerns included adverse effects, misinformation (including from healthcare providers), ever-changing government advice, and complex decision making. In summary, most women in this large WRA cohort were promptly vaccinated, including pregnant/post-partum women. Altruism and community benefit superseded personal benefit as reasons for vaccination. Nevertheless, responders experienced angst and received vaccine-related misinformation and discouragement. These findings should inform vaccination strategies in WRA.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR134293, CDRF-23/2020, CDRF-22/2020)
- Chronic Disease Research Foundation (NIHR134293, CDRF-23/2020, CDRF-22/2020)
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- National surveillance data analysis of COVID-19 vaccine uptake in England by women of reproductive ageNature Communications, 2023
- The risk of miscarriage following COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysisHuman Reproduction, 2023
- A systematic review of communication interventions for countering vaccine misinformationVaccine, 2023
- Neuropsychiatric outcomes in offspring after fetal exposure to maternal influenza infection during pregnancy: A systematic reviewReproductive Toxicology, 2022
- Maternal and perinatal outcomes of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in unvaccinated pregnancies during Delta and Omicron wavesUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2022
- Frequency of Adverse Events in the Placebo Arms of COVID-19 Vaccine TrialsJAMA Network Open, 2022
- COVID‐19 and stillbirth: direct vs indirect effect of the pandemicUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021
- Symptoms and syndromes associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection and severity in pregnant women from two community cohortsScientific Reports, 2021
- Real-time tracking of self-reported symptoms to predict potential COVID-19Nature Medicine, 2020
- Incidence of Early Loss of PregnancyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988