Single Versus Double-Bundle PCL Reconstruction: Scientific Rationale and Clinical Evidence
- 19 April 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
- Vol. 11 (2) , 285-289
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to review the biomechanical and clinical rationale for single-bundle versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. The primary question is whether there has been demonstrated any clear biomechanical or clinical superiority of a double-bundle reconstruction over a single-bundle reconstruction.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Anterolateral Transtibial Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Combined With Anatomical Reconstruction of Posterolateral Corner InsufficiencyThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2010
- Anatomy and Biomechanics of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament, Medial and Lateral Sides of the KneeSports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review, 2010
- A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Arthroscopic Single-Bundle and Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions Preserving Remnant FibersThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2010
- Single- Versus Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2010
- A Comparison of Arthroscopically Assisted Single and Double Bundle Tibial Inlay Reconstruction for Isolated Posterior Cruciate Ligament InjuryClinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 2010
- Isolated Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries of the KneeSports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review, 2006
- A Biomechanical Comparison of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions Using Single- and Double-Bundle Tibial Inlay TechniquesThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2005
- Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: one‐ vs. two‐tunnel techniqueScandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 2004
- Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in the AthleteSports Medicine, 2002
- Long-term results of nonoperative treatment of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries in the athleteThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1986