The effect of intermittent compared with continuous energy restriction on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: 24-month follow-up of a randomised noninferiority trial
- 1 May 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
- Vol. 151, 11-19
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- University of South Australia Postgraduate award
- National Health and Medical Research Council principal research fellowship
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of Intermittent Compared With Continuous Energy Restricted Diet on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 DiabetesJAMA Network Open, 2018
- Intermittent fasting in Type 2 diabetes mellitus and the risk of hypoglycaemia: a randomized controlled trialDiabetic Medicine, 2018
- Potential Benefits and Harms of Intermittent Energy Restriction and Intermittent Fasting Amongst Obese, Overweight and Normal Weight Subjects—A Narrative Review of Human and Animal EvidenceBehavioral Sciences, 2017
- The effects of intermittent compared to continuous energy restriction on glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes; a pragmatic pilot trialDiabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 2016
- Weight-Loss Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intermittent Energy Restriction Trials Lasting a Minimum of 6 MonthsNutrients, 2016
- Do intermittent diets provide physiological benefits over continuous diets for weight loss? A systematic review of clinical trialsMolecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 2015
- Intermittent energy restriction and weight loss: a systematic reviewEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2015
- Intermittent Fasting and Human Metabolic HealthJournal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2015
- Fasting for weight loss: an effective strategy or latest dieting trend?International Journal of Obesity, 2014
- Intermittent versus daily calorie restriction: which diet regimen is more effective for weight loss?Obesity Reviews, 2011