Computer-Assisted Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared with Standard Total Knee Arthroplasty
- 1 January 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
- Vol. 90 (1) , 2-9
Abstract
Background: There is little information on the feasibility of computer navigation when using a minimally invasive approach for total knee arthroplasty, during which the anatomic landmarks for registration may be obscured. The purpose of the present study was to determine the radiographic accuracy of this technique and to compare the rate of functional recovery between patients who underwent computer-assisted minimally invasive arthroplasty and those who underwent conventional total knee arthroplasty. Methods: One hundred and eight consecutive patients were randomized to undergo computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty or conventional total knee arthroplasty. Perioperative pain management was standardized. The clinical parameters, long-leg radiographs, and functional assessment scores were evaluated for six months postoperatively. Results: Patients who underwent computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty had a significantly longer operative time (by a mean of twenty-four minutes) and a significantly shorter inpatient stay (3.3 compared with 4.5 days) in comparison with those who underwent conventional arthroplasty (p ≤ 0.001). Significantly more patients in the computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty group were able to walk independently for more than thirty minutes at one month (p = 0.04). The percentage of patients with a coronal tibiofemoral angle within ±3° of the ideal was 92% for the computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty group, compared with 68% for the conventional total knee arthroplasty group (p = 0.003). Conclusions: Although specific clinical parameters reflect an early increased rate of functional recovery in association with computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty within the first postoperative month, the main advantage of this technique over conventional total knee arthroplasty is improved postoperative radiographic alignment without increased short-term complications. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mini-Incision: Occasionally Desirable, Rarely Necessary: In OppositionThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2006
- Early assessment of the likely cost-effectiveness of a new technology: A Markov model with probabilistic sensitivity analysis of computer-assisted total knee replacementInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2006
- Computer Navigation versus Standard Instrumentation for TKAClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2005
- Computer Assisted Navigation in Total Knee ArthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2005
- Randomized Control Trial Comparing Radiographic Total Knee Arthroplasty Implant Placement Using Computer Navigation Versus Conventional TechniqueThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2005
- Leg Axis After Computer-Navigated Total Knee ArthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2005
- The Chetranjan Ranawat Award: Tibial Component Failure Mechanisms in Total Knee ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2004
- Navigation Improves Accuracy of Rotational Alignment in Total Knee ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2004
- Alignment in total knee arthroplastyThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2004
- Analysis of outcome measures for persons with patellofemoral pain: which are reliable and valid?11No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2004