Primary vs redo robotic pyeloplasty: A comparison of outcomes

This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:

• Management of recurrent ureteral stricture: a retrospectively comparative study with robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus open approach
  PeerJ, 2019
• Is secondary robotic pyeloplasty safe and effective as primary robotic pyeloplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis
  Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2019
• Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population: a review of technique, outcomes, complications, and special considerations in infants
  Pediatric Surgery International, 2017
• Reoperative robotic pyeloplasty in children
  Journal of Pediatric Urology, 2016
• National Trends in Secondary Procedures Following Pediatric Pyeloplasty
  Journal of Urology, 2016
• Failed pyeloplasty in children: Is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible?
  Journal of Pediatric Urology, 2015
• Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Reoperative Repair for Failed Pyeloplasty in Children: A Safe and Highly Effective Treatment Option
  Journal of Urology, 2012
• The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications
  Annals of Surgery, 2009
• Surgical management of failed pyeloplasty in children: Single-center experience
  Journal of Pediatric Urology, 2009
• Robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients of ureteropelvic junction obstruction with previously failed open surgical repair
  International Journal of Urology, 2008