ONE‐STOP SHOPS FOR SOCIAL WELFARE: THE ADAPTATION OF AN ORGANIZATIONAL FORM IN THREE COUNTRIES
- 31 May 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Public Administration
- Vol. 89 (4) , 1451-1468
Abstract
In recent years welfare services in Western Europe have been criticized for poor coordination. In response, ‘seamlessness’ has emerged as a vision for public administration with ‘one‐stop shops' viewed as means to reach this. This article conceptualizes the one‐stop shop and presents a three country case study to examine its drivers and its adaptation. In all countries the reforms meant mergers driven by hopes for a single entrance to services as well as proximity to citizens. However, the analysis of task portfolios, participant structure, instruments and autonomy reveal important variations in the adaptations. The specific configurations of one‐stop shops that emerged were partially a product of compromises and negotiations influenced by the political and performance priorities of central government. The classical trade‐off between specialization and coordination persists, but by offering users ICT‐based services one can to some extent maintain specialization behind the frontline and still provide services that are coordinated from a user perspective.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mapping the Governance Reform of Welfare to Work in Britain Under New LaborInternational Journal of Public Administration, 2009
- Reorganizing the welfare state administrationPublic Management Review, 2009
- Delivering 'Public Value': Implications for Accountability and LegitimacyParliamentary Affairs, 2009
- Interdependence in Comparative PoliticsComparative Political Studies, 2008
- Reform by Coincidence? Explaining the Policy Process of Structural Reform in DenmarkScandinavian Political Studies, 2007
- Janus-faced reorganization: specialization and coordination in four OECD countries in the period 1980—2005International Review of Administrative Sciences, 2007
- Taking ‘Galton's Problem’ SeriouslyJournal of Theoretical Politics, 2006
- The UK Core Executive's Use of Public Service Agreements as a Tool of GovernancePublic Administration, 2004
- New forms of local accountability: coming to terms with ‘many hands’?Policy & Politics, 2003
- Mandated ‘Joined-Up’ Working: A Pandora’. Box for Welfarist Organisations?Public Policy and Administration, 2001