Assessing ChatGPT's ability to emulate human reviewers in scientific research: A descriptive and qualitative approach

This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:

• Guidance for Authors, Peer Reviewers, and Editors on Use of AI, Language Models, and Chatbots
  JAMA, 2023
• Comparing Physician and Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions Posted to a Public Social Media Forum
  JAMA Internal Medicine, 2023
• The dangers of using large language models for peer review
  The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2023
• Using ChatGPT to write patient clinic letters
  The Lancet Digital Health, 2023
• Nonhuman “Authors” and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge
  JAMA, 2023
• Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing
  The Lancet Digital Health, 2023
• ChatGPT: the future of discharge summaries?
  The Lancet Digital Health, 2023
• ChatGPT: evolution or revolution?
  Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2023
• A conversation with ChatGPT on the role of computational systems biology in stem cell research
  Stem Cell Reports, 2023
• A Conversation on Artificial Intelligence, Chatbots, and Plagiarism in Higher Education
  Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, 2023