Strategic reward systems: a contingency model of pay system design
Authors:
- 12 July 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Strategic Management Journal
- Vol. 22 (8) , 777-792
Abstract
A limited number of studies have addressed the idea of ‘strategic’ reward systems—the matching of compensation systems to a firm's strategy. Prior research on this topic has been confined to U.S. firms, however, and a number of key questions remain unanswered. Using a sample of 917 employees from two large Swiss financial institutions, we found that pay systems are linked with divisional strategic orientation, but in a different form than prior studies. Additionally, we identify hierarchical position as an important variable in the tailoring of reward systems. Hierarchy has a significant main effect on pay plan design, and an interactive effect with strategic orientation. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reframing Execufive Compensation: An Assessment and OutlookJournal of Management, 1997
- EXECUTIVE REWARD SYSTEMS: A CROSS‐NATIONAL COMPARISON*Journal of Management Studies, 1993
- The effect of compensation program and structure on sbu competitive strategy: A study of technology‐intensive firmsStrategic Management Journal, 1991
- Determinants of Top Management Compensation: Explaining the Impact of Economic, Behavioral, and Strategic Constructs and the Moderating Effects of IndustryJournal of Management, 1990
- Environment, planning processes, and organizational performance of churchesStrategic Management Journal, 1988
- Strategic orientation and characteristics of upper managementStrategic Management Journal, 1987
- Product diversification, performance criteria and compensation at the corporate manager levelStrategic Management Journal, 1987
- BUILD, HOLD, HARVEST: CONVERTING STRATEGIC INTENTIONS INTO REALITYJournal of Business Strategy, 1984
- Moral Hazard and ObservabilityThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1979
- Organizational Strategy, Structure, and ProcessAcademy of Management Review, 1978