Thoracic Pedicle Screw Instrumentation
Authors:
- Baron S. LonnerBLBaron S. Lonner
- Joshua D. AuerbachJAJoshua D. Auerbach
- Michael B. EstreicherMEMichael B. Estreicher
- Kristin E. KeanKKKristin E. Kean
- 1 September 2009
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 34 (20) , 2158-2164
Abstract
Retrospective review. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the learning curve and associated evolution in surgical technique with thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Common treatment for AIS now includes posterior spinal fusion, using thoracic pedicle screws (TPS). It is critical to assess the efficacy, safety profile, and learning curve associated with this technique as its use becomes more widespread among inexperienced surgeons. Retrospective review of the senior author’s first 96 TPS cases for Lenke Type I AIS curves. Multiple regression techniques were used to discern whether increasing case number (CN) was associated with improved perioperative and 2-year minimum radiographic and clinical outcomes. The 96 cases were divided into 4 equal quartiles of 24 cases/group (i.e., Q1–Q4) and compared using analysis of variance measures. A total of 1169 thoracic pedicle screws were placed in 96 patients. We found a significant correlation between CN and major curve correction at 2 years (P < 0.0001), inverse correlation between CN and length of stay (P = 0.02), and estimated blood loss (P = 0.03), but no differences in cell saver or complications. Univariate analysis revealed significant inverse correlations between increasing CN and transfusion rate (P = 0.02) and operative times (P = 0.0001). Total number of screws placed (Q1:9.4 vs. Q4:16.2, P < 0.0001) and number of screws/level (Q1:0.98 vs. Q4:1.64, P < 0.0001) increased linearly with increasing CN, whereas the average time for screw placement (Q1:24.2 vs. Q4:11.4 minutes, P < 0.0001) and ability to maintain T2–T12 kyphosis decreased (Q1:0.21 vs. Q4:−5.5 P = 0.02) with increasing CN. There is a significant learning curve associated with thoracic pedicle screw placement in AIS. We describe several technical steps that can be taken to increase the safety of screw placement at the beginning of the learning curve. Inexperienced surgeons should expect a gradual improvement over time in radiographic and clinical outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of the Lowest Instrumented, Stable, and Lower End Vertebrae in “Single Overhang” Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Anterior Versus Posterior Spinal FusionSpine, 2006
- Thoracoscopic Spinal Fusion Compared with Posterior Spinal Fusion for the Treatment of Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic ScoliosisJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2006
- Pseudarthrosis in Adult Spinal Deformity Following Multisegmental Instrumentation and ArthrodesisJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2006
- Comparative Analysis of Pedicle Screw Versus Hybrid Instrumentation in Posterior Spinal Fusion of Adolescent Idiopathic ScoliosisSpine, 2006
- Mini-open thoracoscopically assisted thoracotomy versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for anterior release in thoracic scoliosis and kyphosis: a comparison of operative and radiographic resultsThe Spine Journal, 2005
- Monaxial Versus Multiaxial Thoracic Pedicle Screws in the Correction of Adolescent Idiopathic ScoliosisSpine, 2005
- Accuracy and Efficacy of Thoracic Pedicle Screws in Curves More Than 90°Spine, 2005
- Thoracic pedicle screw placement: Free-hand techniqueNeurology India, 2005
- Comparative Analysis of Pedicle Screw Versus Hook Instrumentation in Posterior Spinal Fusion of Adolescent Idiopathic ScoliosisSpine, 2004
- Spontaneous Proximal Thoracic Curve Correction After Isolated Fusion of the Main Thoracic Curve in Adolescent Idiopathic ScoliosisSpine, 2001