The Value of Routine Outcome Measurement for Consumers of Mental Health Services: Master or Servant?
- 1 July 2008
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in International Journal of Social Psychiatry
- Vol. 54 (4) , 317-327
Abstract
Background: Standardized instruments have been introduced for routine use within Victorian mental health services. The aim of routine outcome measurement (ROM) is to ensure the highest standard of service delivery as demonstrated through quality and accountability processes.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- In our own words: Consumers’ views on the reality of consumer participation in mental health careContemporary Nurse, 2006
- STANDARDIZED ROUTINE OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: RESPONSE TO LAKEMANInternational Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 2005
- Standardized routine outcome measurement: Pot holes in the road to recoveryInternational Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 2004
- The Scottish 700 Outcomes Study: A Comparative Evaluation of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale (HoNOS), the Avon Mental Health Measure (AVON), and an Idiographic Scale (OPUS) in adult mental healthJournal of Mental Health, 2004
- MENTAL HEALTH REFORMS AND THEIR IMPACT ON CONSUMER AND CARER PARTICIPATION: A PERSPECTIVE FROM VICTORIA, AUSTRALIAIssues in Mental Health Nursing, 2004
- Mental health outcomes in Australia: Issues for mental health nursesInternational Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 2003
- Consumer participation in mental health services: looking from a consumer perspectiveJournal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 2003
- Outcomes research in mental healthThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 2002
- A Conceptual Review of Functioning: Implications for the Development of Consumer Outcome MeasuresAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 2001
- The effects of consumer vs. staff administration on the measurement of consumer satisfaction with psychiatric rehabilitation.Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 1998