Exploring mock juror evaluations of forensic evidence conclusion formats within a complete expert report

This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:

• The interpretation of forensic conclusions by criminal justice professionals: The same evidence interpreted differently
  Forensic Science International, 2020
• Communicating forensic science opinion: An examination of expert reporting practices
  Science & Justice, 2020
• The forensic disclosure model: What should be disclosed to, and by, forensic experts?
  International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 2019
• Trends and issues in the communication of forensic science
  Forensic Science International, 2019
• Development and Validation of the Scientific Reasoning Scale
  Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2015
• On the interpretation of likelihood ratios in forensic science evidence: Presentation formats and the weak evidence effect
  Forensic Science International, 2014
• Forensic scientists’ conclusions: How readable are they for non-scientist report-users?
  Forensic Science International, 2013
• The testimony of forensic identification science: What expert witnesses say and what factfinders hear.
  Law and Human Behavior, 2009
• Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion
  Science & Justice, 2009
• Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy.
  Law and Human Behavior, 1987