Ranking metrics conceal pose errors in blind docking with AutoDock Vina, a cross-target benchmark
Authors:
- Oluwaseun Emmanuel AgboolaOluwaseun Emmanuel Agboola
- Samuel S AgboolaSASamuel S Agboola
- Temitope C AribigbolaTATemitope C Aribigbola
- Anuoluwapo Bukola ShaleyeASAnuoluwapo Bukola Shaleye
- Odunayo Selimot AdedejiOAOdunayo Selimot Adedeji
- Zainab A AyinlaZAZainab A Ayinla
- Idowu O OmotuyiIOIdowu O Omotuyi
Open Access
- 27 August 2026
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Results in Engineering
- Vol. 32
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can Deep Learning Blind Docking Methods be Used to Predict Allosteric Compounds?Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 2025
- An accurate and universal protein-small molecule batch docking solution using Autodock VinaResults in Engineering, 2023
- AutoDock Vina 1.2.0: New Docking Methods, Expanded Force Field, and Python BindingsJournal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 2021
- Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions: The CASF-2016 UpdateJournal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 2018
- Evaluation of AutoDock and AutoDock Vina on the CASF-2013 BenchmarkJournal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 2018
- AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreadingJournal of Computational Chemistry, 2009
- Comparison of Several Molecular Docking Programs: Pose Prediction and Virtual Screening AccuracyJournal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 2009
- Improving accuracy and efficiency of blind protein‐ligand docking by focusing on predicted binding sitesProteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 2008
- Evaluating Virtual Screening Methods: Good and Bad Metrics for the “Early Recognition” ProblemJournal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 2007
- Blind docking of drug‐sized compounds to proteins with up to a thousand residuesFEBS Letters, 2006