Ecology and Opportunity: Intergenerational Equity and Sustainable Options
Author:
- Bryan NortonBNBryan Norton
- 1 April 1999
- book chapter
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP)
- p. 118-150
Abstract
Bryan Norton suggests that there are two ways of answering the sustainability question, ‘what to sustain?’ They are ‘utility comparison’ and ‘listing stuff’. While preferable to the former, the latter lacks a unifying theory of value, he says, and so any specification of what to bequeath to future generations will embody powerful normative assumptions. These assumptions, he argues, should be rooted in the norms of specific localities. Loss of natural value across generations must be regarded, Norton suggests, as non‐compensable, so environmental sustainability will involve the mandatory protection of whatever physical features are regarded as valuable in a given locality.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- The environmental justice/toxics movement: Politics of race and gender∗Capitalism Nature Socialism, 1997
- Environmental justice (Local and Global)*Capitalism Nature Socialism, 1997
- Environment sustainabilities: An analysis and a typologyEnvironmental Politics, 1996
- Resilience and optionsEcological Economics, 1995
- Evaluating ecosystem states: Two competing paradigmsEcological Economics, 1995
- Economics and "Sustainability": Balancing Trade-Offs and ImperativesLand Economics, 1994
- Cuba's nationwide conversion to organic agriculture∗Capitalism Nature Socialism, 1994
- Environmental security and state legitimacy∗Capitalism Nature Socialism, 1994
- Deliberative Democracy and Social ChoicePolitical Studies, 1992
- Towards an ecological economics of sustainabilityEcological Economics, 1992