Development and validation of a machine learning-based explainable predictive model for long-term net adverse clinical events in patients with high bleeding risk undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from a prospective cohort study
Open Access
- 23 June 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in International Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 111 (9) , 6082-6092
Abstract
Background: Patients classified as having a high bleeding risk (HBR) and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) face a significantly greater incidence of net adverse clinical events (NACEs) than non-HBR patients do. Existing risk assessment models, such as the CRUSADE and TIMI scores, do not adequately address the unique risks faced by the HBR population. There is an urgent need for a precise and comprehensive predictive model tailored to PCI-HBR patients to guide clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes. Methods: This study aimed to develop a machine learning-based predictive model for long-term NACE in PCI-HBR patients. We utilized data from the Prognostic Analysis and an Appropriate Antiplatelet Strategy for Patients with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and High Bleeding Risk registry database. Feature selection and interpretation were performed via a SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) model based on recursive feature elimination. Model construction and evaluation were conducted via four algorithms: logistic regression, random forest, gradient boosting, and XGBoost. Results: A total of 1512 PCI-HBR patients were included in the study. The XGBoost model demonstrated the highest predictive performance, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85. The SHAP model identified 24 significant variables contributing to the prediction of NACE, including clinical parameters, laboratory findings, and echocardiographic data. Conclusions: Our machine learning-based model offers a promising tool for predicting long-term NACE in PCI-HBR patients. The model’s high predictive accuracy and interpretability have the potential to enhance clinical decision-making and improve patient care. Further validation in larger, diverse populations is warranted to confirm these findings.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Defining high bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a consensus document from the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding RiskEuropean Heart Journal, 2019
- Relation of Baseline Hemoglobin Level to In-Hospital Outcomes in Patients Who Undergo Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (from a Japanese Multicenter Registry)The American Journal of Cardiology, 2018
- Coronary Thrombosis and Major Bleeding After PCI With Drug-Eluting StentsJACC, 2016
- Machine learning applications in genetics and genomicsNature Reviews Genetics, 2015
- Risk score to predict serious bleeding in stable outpatients with or at risk of atherothrombosisEuropean Heart Journal, 2010
- Baseline Risk of Major Bleeding in Non–ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial InfarctionCirculation, 2009
- Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent TrialsCirculation, 2007
- The initial anion gap is a predictor of mortality in acute myocardial infarctionCoronary Artery Disease, 2006
- Left atrial diameter as an independent predictor of first clinical cardiovascular events in middle-aged and elderly adults: The Strong Heart Study (SHS)American Heart Journal, 2006
- TIMI Risk Score for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Convenient, Bedside, Clinical Score for Risk Assessment at PresentationCirculation, 2000