Lens Model Accuracy in the Expected LSST Lensed AGN Sample
Authors:
- Padmavathi VenkatramanPVPadmavathi Venkatraman
- Sydney EricksonSESydney Erickson
- Phil MarshallPMPhil Marshall
- Martin MillonMMMartin Millon
- Philip HollowayPHPhilip Holloway
- Simon BirrerSBSimon Birrer
- Steven DillmannSDSteven Dillmann
- Xiangyu HuangXHXiangyu Huang
- Sreevani JaragulaSJSreevani Jaragula
- Narayan KhadkaNKNarayan Khadka
Open Access
- 22 September 2026
- journal article
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astronomical Journal
- Vol. 172 (4) , 223
Abstract
Strong gravitational lensing of active galactic nuclei (AGN) enables measurements of cosmological parameters through time-delay cosmography (TDC). With data from the upcoming LSST survey, we anticipate using a sample of O ( 1000 ) lensed AGN for TDC. To prepare for this dataset and enable this measurement, we construct and analyze a realistic mock sample of 1300 systems drawn from the OM10 catalog of simulated lenses with AGN sources at z < 3.1 in order to test a key aspect of the analysis pipeline, that of the lens modeling. We realize the lenses as power-law elliptical mass distributions and simulate 5 yr LSST i -band coadd images. From every image, we infer the lens mass model parameters using neural posterior estimation. Focusing on the key model parameters, θ E (the Einstein radius) and γ lens (the projected mass density profile slope), with consistent mass–light ellipticity correlations in test and training data, we recover θ E with less than 1% bias on average, 6.5% precision per lens, and γ lens with less than 3% bias on average, 8% precision per lens. We find that lens light subtraction prior to modeling is only useful when applied to data sampled from the training prior. If emulated deconvolution is applied to the data prior to modeling, precision improves across all parameters by a factor of 2. Finally, we combine the inferred lens mass models using Bayesian hierarchical inference to recover the global properties of the lens sample with less than 1% bias under consistent train–test mass–light correlations.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- NSF ∣ National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (2021313357)
- U.S. Department of Energy (DE-SC0026113)
- UKRI ∣ Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/W507726/1)
- U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC02-76SF00515)
This publication has 68 references indexed in Scilit:
- Time-Delay Cosmography: Measuring the Hubble Constant and Other Cosmological Parameters with Strong Gravitational LensingSpace Science Reviews, 2024
- Strong lensing time-delay cosmography in the 2020sThe Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 2022
- Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomaliesJournal of High Energy Astrophysics, 2022
- Array programming with NumPyNature, 2020
- Planck2018 resultsAstronomy & Astrophysics, 2020
- Tensions between the early and late UniverseNature Astronomy, 2019
- lenstronomy: Multi-purpose gravitational lens modelling software packagePhysics of the Dark Universe, 2018
- Fast automated analysis of strong gravitational lenses with convolutional neural networksNature, 2017
- Time delay cosmographyThe Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 2016
- Starlet Transform in Astronomical Data Processing2015