A multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study of variation in practice in perioperative analgesia strategies in elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery (the LapCoGesic study)
Authors:
- D HarjiDHD Harji
- on behalf of NoSTRA (Northern Surgical Trainees Reseach Association)OAon behalf of NoSTRA (Northern Surgical Trainees Reseach Association)
- 1 January 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Royal College of Surgeons of England in The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
- Vol. 102 (1) , 28-35
Abstract
Introduction: Enhanced recovery programmes are established as an essential part of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Optimal pain management is central to the success of an enhanced recovery programme and is acknowledged to be an important patient reported outcome measure. A variety of analgesia strategies are employed in elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery ranging from patient-controlled analgesia to local anaesthetic wound infiltration catheters. However, there is little evidence regarding the optimal analgesia strategy in this cohort of patients. The LapCoGesic study aimed to explore differences in analgesia strategies employed for patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery and to assess whether this variation in practice has an impact on patient-reported and clinical outcomes. Materials and methods: A prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection was undertaken over a two-month period. The primary outcome measure was postoperative pain scores at 24 hours. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 22. Results: A total of 103 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery were included in the study. Thoracic epidural was used in 4 (3.9%) patients, spinal diamorphine in 56 (54.4%) patients and patient-controlled analgesia in 77 (74.8%) patients. The use of thoracic epidural and spinal diamorphine were associated with lower pain scores on day 1 postoperatively (P < 0.05). The use of patient-controlled analgesia was associated with significantly higher postoperative pain scores and pain severity. Discussion: Postoperative pain is managed in a variable manner in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery, which has an impact on patient reported outcomes of pain scores and pain severity.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Randomized clinical trial of epidural, spinal or patient-controlled analgesia for patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgeryBritish Journal of Surgery, 2011
- The surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopic or conventional total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: a randomized trialInternational Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2010
- The minimum clinically significant difference in patient-assigned numeric scores for painThe American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2005
- Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trialThe Lancet Oncology, 2005
- Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2005
- Randomized clinical trial comparing epidural anaesthesia and patient-controlled analgesia after laparoscopic segmental colectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 2003
- What decline in pain intensity is meaningful to patients with acute pain?Pain, 2003
- Postoperative Pain Experience: Results from a National Survey Suggest Postoperative Pain Continues to Be UndermanagedAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2003
- Metabolic and Functional Results After Laparoscopic Colorectal SurgeryDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2002
- COLORSurgical Endoscopy, 2002